Journal of the Medical Library Association (Oct 2019)

Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking

  • Zachary E. Fox,
  • Annette M. Williams,
  • Mallory N. Blasingame,
  • Taneya Y. Koonce,
  • Sheila V. Kusnoor,
  • Jing Su,
  • Patricia Lee,
  • Marcia I. Epelbaum,
  • Helen M. Naylor,
  • Spencer J. DesAutels,
  • Elizabeth T. Frakes,
  • Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 107, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process.

Keywords