PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: An in vitro study.

  • Jungwon Lee,
  • Young-Jun Lim,
  • Jin-Soo Ahn,
  • Bongju Kim,
  • Yeon-Wha Baek,
  • Bum-Soon Lim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290595
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 5
p. e0290595

Abstract

Read online

Non-invasive objective implant stability measurements are needed to determine the appropriate timing of prosthetic fitting after implant placement. We compared the early implant stability results obtained using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity analysis (DCA) depending on the implant length and bone density. Total 60, 4.0 mm diameter implants of various lengths (7.3 mm, 10 mm, and 13 mm) were used. In Group I, low-density bone was described using 15 PCF (0.24 g/cm3) polyurethane bone blocks, and in Group II, 30 PCF (0.48 g/cm3) polyurethane bone blocks were used to describe medium density bone. RFA was performed using an Osstell® Beacon+; DCA was performed using Anycheck®. Measurements were repeated five times for each implant. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05. In Group I, bone density and primary implant stability were positively correlated, while implant length and primary implant stability were positively correlated. In Group II, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) and implant stability test (IST) values in did not change significantly above a certain length. Primary implant stability was positively correlated with bone density and improved with increasing implant length at low bone densities. Compared with the Osstell® Beacon+, the simplicity of Anycheck® was easy to use and accessible.