Advances in Radiation Oncology (Mar 2022)

Adoption of Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer

  • Kelsey L. Corrigan, MD, MPH,
  • Xiudong Lei, PhD,
  • Neelofur Ahmad, MD,
  • Isidora Arzu, MD, PhD,
  • Elizabeth Bloom, MD,
  • Stephen G. Chun, MD,
  • Chelain Goodman, MD, PhD,
  • Karen E. Hoffman, MD, MHSc, MPH,
  • Melissa Joyner, MD,
  • Lauren Mayo, MD,
  • Melissa Mitchell, MD, PhD,
  • Kevin T. Nead, MD, MPhil,
  • George H. Perkins, MD,
  • Valerie Reed, MD,
  • Jay P. Reddy, MD, PhD,
  • Pamela Schlembach, MD,
  • Simona F. Shaitelman, MD, EdM,
  • Michael C. Stauder, MD,
  • Eric A. Strom, MD,
  • Welela Tereffe, MD, MPH,
  • Lee Wiederhold, MD, PhD,
  • Wendy A. Woodward, MD, PhD,
  • Benjamin D. Smith, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 2
p. 100877

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The first high-quality clinical trial to support ultrahypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (ultra-HF-WBI) for invasive early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) was published in April 2020, coinciding with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed adoption of ultra-HF-WBI for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ESBC at our institution after primary trial publication. Methods and Materials: We evaluated radiation fractionation prescriptions for all patients with DCIS or ESBC treated with WBI from March 2020 to May 2021 at our main campus and regional campuses. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Treating physician characteristics were collected from licensure data. Hierarchical logistic regression models identified factors correlated with adoption of ultra-HF-WBI (26 Gy in 5 daily factions [UK-FAST-FORWARD] or 28.5 Gy in 5 weekly fractions [UK-FAST]). Results: Of 665 included patients, the median age was 61.5 years, and 478 patients (71.9%) had invasive, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Twenty-one physicians treated the included patients. In total, 249 patients (37.4%) received ultra-HF-WBI, increasing from 4.3% (2 of 46) in March-April 2020 to a high of 45.5% (45 of 99) in July-August 2020 (P < .001). Patient factors associated with increased use of ultra-HF-WBI included older age (≥50 years old), low-grade WBI without inclusion of the low axilla, no radiation boost, and farther travel distance (P < .03). Physician variation accounted for 21.7% of variance in the outcome, with rate of use of ultra-HF-WBI by the treating physicians ranging from 0% to 75.6%. No measured physician characteristics were associated with use of ultra-HF-WBI. Conclusions: Adoption of ultra-HF-WBI at our institution increased substantially after the publication of randomized evidence supporting its use. Ultra-HF-WBI was preferentially used in patients with lower risk disease, suggesting careful selection for this new approach while long-term data are maturing. Substantial physician-level variation may reflect a lack of consensus on the evidentiary standards required to change practice.