Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (Sep 2021)

Long-Term Conditions in Older People are Linked with Loneliness, but a Sense of Coherence Buffers the Adverse Effects on Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • van Woerden HC,
  • Angus N,
  • Kiparoglou V,
  • Atherton I,
  • Leung J

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 14
pp. 2467 – 2475

Abstract

Read online

Hugo C van Woerden,1,2 Neil Angus,2 Vasiliki Kiparoglou,3 Iain Atherton,4 Janni Leung5 1University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Science, Inverness, IV2 3JH, UK; 2Ulster University, Coleraine, County Londonderry, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK; 3National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Unipart House Business Centre, Oxford, OX4 2PG, UK; 4Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK; 5University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, AustraliaCorrespondence: Hugo C van Woerden Email [email protected]: The impact of disability, long-term conditions, rurality, living alone, and being a carer on health has some evidence base, but the extent to which a strong sense of coherence (SoC), a factor hypothesised to promote wellbeing, may moderate these associations is unknown. A model of physical, environmental and social factors on quality of life was tested, with particular emphasis on whether a strong SoC buffered (mitigated) these determinants of quality of life.Material and Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey was undertaken of a random sample of 1471 respondents aged over 65 years, across a population of rural individuals. Physical, environmental, and psychological variables were assessed against quality of life using ANOVA and a generalised linear model including the interaction effects of SoC.Results: ANOVA demonstrated that age, gender, long-term conditions or disability (LTC-D), living alone, > 20 hours unpaid care for others per week, SoC, and loneliness, were associated with lower quality of life (p 0.01), between age and LTC-D, living alone, and poor SoC. Living alone was correlated with emotional and social loneliness; but those with higher SoC were less likely to experience loneliness. In an adjusted generalised linear model, significant associations with a lower quality of life were observed from: LTC-D, emotional loneliness and social loneliness (B= − 0.44, − 0.30, and − 0.39, respectively, all p< 0.001). The only interaction with SoC that was statistically significant (at p< 0.05) was LTC-D. A stronger sense of coherence buffered the negative effects of long-term condition/disability on quality of life.Discussion: The physical, environmental and social factors examined, identified LTC-D and loneliness to be the strongest factors associated with poor quality of life.Conclusion: SoC somewhat buffered the adverse effect of LTC-D on quality of life, but did not do so for loneliness.Keywords: loneliness, social loneliness, disability, rurality, quality of life

Keywords