Cancer Communications (Oct 2024)

Perioperative toripalimab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcomes in resectable esophageal cancer: an interim analysis of a phase III randomized clinical trial

  • Yan Zheng,
  • Guanghui Liang,
  • Dongfeng Yuan,
  • Xianben Liu,
  • Yufeng Ba,
  • Zimin Qin,
  • Sining Shen,
  • Zhenxuan Li,
  • Haibo Sun,
  • Baoxing Liu,
  • Quanli Gao,
  • Peng Li,
  • Zongfei Wang,
  • Shilei Liu,
  • Jianping Zhu,
  • Haoran Wang,
  • Haibo Ma,
  • Zhenzhen Liu,
  • Fei Zhao,
  • Jun Zhang,
  • He Zhang,
  • Daoyuan Wu,
  • Jinrong Qu,
  • Jie Ma,
  • Peng Zhang,
  • Wenjie Ma,
  • Ming Yan,
  • Yongkui Yu,
  • Qing Li,
  • Jiangong Zhang,
  • Wenqun Xing

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12604
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 44, no. 10
pp. 1214 – 1227

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In the era of immunotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is used clinically but lacks of high‐level clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety and long‐term efficacy of NAIC followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by MIE. Methods A prospective, single‐center, open‐label, randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted at Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) + cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (toripalimab group) or paclitaxel + cisplatin alone (chemotherapy group) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. After surgery, the toripalimab group received toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months). The primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). The pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were also assessed. Results Between May 15, 2020 and August 13, 2021, 252 ESCC patients ranging from T1N1‐3M0 to T2‐3N0‐3M0 were enrolled for interim analysis, with 127 in the toripalimab group and 125 in the chemotherapy group. The 1‐year EFS rate was 77.9% in the toripalimab group compared to 64.3% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 1.00; P = 0.05). The 1‐year OS rates were 94.1% and 83.0% in the toripalimab and chemotherapy groups, respectively (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.037). The patients in the toripalimab group had a higher pCR rate (18.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative Clavien‐Dindo grade IIIb or higher morbidity were 9.8% in the toripalimab group and 6.8% in the chemotherapy group, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.460). The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment‐related AEs did not differ between the two groups (12.5% versus 12.4%). Conclusions The interim results of this ongoing trial showed that in resectable ESCC, the addition of perioperative toripalimab to NAC is safe, may improve OS and might change the standard treatment in the future.

Keywords