Frontiers in Oncology (Apr 2021)

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Minimization Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

  • Oscar Arrieta,
  • Oscar Arrieta,
  • Wendy Muñoz-Montaño,
  • Sae Muñiz-Hernández,
  • Saul Campos,
  • Rodrigo Catalán,
  • Rodrigo Catalán,
  • Herman Soto-Molina,
  • Silvia Guzmán Vázquez,
  • Osvaldo Díaz-Álvarez,
  • Victor Martínez-Pacheco,
  • Jenny G. Turcott,
  • Maritza Ramos-Ramírez,
  • Maritza Ramos-Ramírez,
  • Luis Cabrera-Miranda,
  • Luis Cabrera-Miranda,
  • Feliciano Barrón,
  • Feliciano Barrón,
  • Andrés F. Cardona,
  • Andrés F. Cardona

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.641975
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is rare and aggressive neoplasia, with a poor prognosis; furthermore, the monetary cost of its treatment represents a major challenge for many patients. The economic burden this malignancy imposes is underscored by the fact that asbestos exposure, which is the most frequent risk factor, is much more prevalent in the lower socioeconomic population of developing countries. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of continuous infusion of low-dose Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (CIGC) as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable MPM.MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study to determine efficacy and safety of continuous infusion gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in a 6-h continuous infusion plus cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with unresectable MPM. We also performed a cost-minimization analysis to determine if this chemotherapy regimen is less expensive than other currently used regimens.ResultsThe median number of chemotherapy cycles was six (range 1–11 cycles); objective response rate was documented in 46.2%, and disease control rate was seen in 81.2%. Median PFS was 8.05 months (CI 95% 6.97–9.13); median OS was 16.16 months (CI 95% 12.5–19.9). The cost minimization analysis revealed savings of 66.4, 61.9, and 97.7% comparing CIGC with short-infusion gemcitabine plus cisplatin (SIGC), cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP), and cisplatin plus pemetrexed and bevacizumab (CPB), respectively. Furthermore, this chemotherapy regimen proved to be safe at the administered dosage.ConclusionCIGC is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with unresectable MPM; besides, this combination is a cost-saving option when compared with other frequently used chemotherapy schemes. Therefore, this treatment scheme should be strongly considered for patients with unresectable MPM and limited economic resources.

Keywords