Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (Sep 2024)

A multimodal approach to diagnosis of neuromuscular neosporosis in dogs

  • Vanessa Alf,
  • Federica Tirrito,
  • Andrea Fischer,
  • Rodolfo Cappello,
  • Anna‐Mariam Kiviranta,
  • Tanja A. Steinberg,
  • Federica Poli,
  • Felix Stotz,
  • Omar V. Del Vecchio,
  • Stefanie Dörfelt,
  • Cristian Falzone,
  • André Knittel,
  • Shenja Loderstedt,
  • Edy Mercuriali,
  • Joana Tabanez,
  • Paolo Zagarella,
  • Kaspar Matiasek,
  • Marco Rosati

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17145
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 38, no. 5
pp. 2561 – 2570

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Early diagnosis of neosporosis in dogs is challenging. Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of a compound multimodal testing approach for diagnosing in dogs neuromuscular and combined forms of neosporosis. Animals A total of 16 dogs diagnosed with solely neuromuscular neosporosis or with a combination of neuromuscular and central nervous system neosporosis. Methods Retrospective review of clinical signs, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcome with focus on the diagnostic utility of different tests. Development of a chromogenic in situ hybridization (ISH) assay for the identification of Neospora caninum in paraffin‐embedded muscle samples. Results 13/16 dogs had only neuromuscular signs of neosporosis, 3/16 had disease signs with concomitant central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Serology was performed in 15/16, with 10/15 showing titers >1 : 160 at admission. PCR on muscle samples detected N. caninum DNA in 11/16. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) detected N. caninum in 9/16 and ISH in 9/16. Histopathology revealed inflammatory myopathy in 10/16, necrotizing myopathy in 5/16, borderline changes in 1/16 and tachyzoites in 9/16. In 4 cases, N. caninum infection was confirmed with all 5 diagnostic methods, 3 cases with 4, 2 with 3, 6 with 2, and 1 animal with 1. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Diagnosis of N. caninum infection should rely on a multimodal diagnostic approach and negativity of 1 single test should not allow for exclusion. Serology in combination with direct parasite identification via histopathology, DNA via PCR, or both modalities, appears a reliable diagnostic approach.

Keywords