Analysis of the clinical and economic effectiveness of using benralizumab in comparison with standard therapy in patients with severe bronchial asthma

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the clinical and economic effectiveness of benralizumab in comparison with standard therapy in patients with severe bronchial asthma (SBA) with an eosinophilic phenotype in the Russian Federation.Material and methods. A clinical and economic analysis of using benralizumab in addition to standard therapy was carried out in comparison with standard therapy for SBA with an eosinophilic phenotype by means of a modeling method. Cost calculations were performed in a mathematical model adapted to the Russian healthcare conditions with the help of cost indicators and patient population characteristics.Results. The use of benralizumab as a mandatory component of standard therapy compared with standard therapy alone for SBA with an eosinophilic phenotype will allow for an additional 0.65 life years gained (LYGs) and 1.12 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per 1 patient during lifelong therapy. It will provide avoiding 4.95 exacerbations, simultaneously with a reduction in total costs by 584,144 rubles by reducing gross domestic product (GDP) losses due to mortality and temporary disability over an assessment horizon equal to life expectancy. The costs of 1 LYG and 1 QALY in the case of benralizumab were 869,455 and 1,252,056 rubles, in the case of standard therapy they were 911,615 and 1,303,811 rubles, respectively.Conclusion. Intensification of SBA therapy with an eosinophilic phenotype with benralizumab is clinically justified (leads to an increase in life expectancy, a decrease in the rate of exacerbations and an increase in patients’ working life), and is also economically feasible, as it allows to reduce direct costs and GDP losses of the state.

Keywords

• bronchial asthma
• benralizumab
• cost-effectiveness analysis
• pharmacoeconomic modeling