Patient Preference and Adherence (Apr 2021)

Proxy-Reported Quality of Life and Access to Nusinersen Among Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Saudi Arabia

  • AlRuthia Y,
  • Almuaythir GS,
  • H Alrasheed H,
  • Alsharif WR,
  • Temsah MH,
  • Alsohime F,
  • Sales I,
  • Alwhaibi M,
  • Bashiri FA

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 729 – 739

Abstract

Read online

Yazed AlRuthia,1,2 Ghadah S Almuaythir,1 Hala H Alrasheed,1 Wejdan R Alsharif,1 Mohamad-Hani Temsah,3,4 Fahad Alsohime,3,4 Ibrahim Sales,1 Monira Alwhaibi,1 Fahad A Bashiri3,5 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Yazed AlRuthiaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaTel +996 114677483Fax +966 114677480Email [email protected]: The recent approval of innovative therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), such as nusinersen, has brought hope to patients and their families.Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics and HRQoL of SMA patients treated with nusinersen and those treated with the standard of care.Methods: This was a cross-sectional, interviewer-administered telephone questionnaire, which used a purposive sampling of SMA patients through a social support network. EuroQol five-dimensions-3-level (EQ-5D-3L) and the visual analog scale (VAS) have been used to assess the HRQoL. Different descriptive and inferential tests have been performed to compare the characteristics, EQ-5D responses, and mean scores of EQ-VAS between patients on nusinersen and the standard of care.Results: Eleven out of 36 SMA patients (30.55%) have been treated with nusinersen. Patients with type I SMA represented 54% of those treated with nusinersen (P=0.012). Only 12.5% of SMA patients living in the Mecca region are treated with nusinersen in comparison to 50% of patients living in the Riyadh region (P=0.029). No difference was noticed in the proxy-responses for the five domains of the EQ-5D or the mean VAS scores for patients on nusinersen and the standard of care despite controlling for the SMA type and the ability to breathe independently (β= 1.39, 95% CI= – 5.15-7.93, P=0.667). However, the mean VAS score for patients who are unable to breathe independently was significantly lower than their counterparts who are able to breathe independently even after controlling for the SMA type and nusinersen treatment (β= – 31.61, 95% CI= – 51.59 - – 11.63, P=0.003).Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the uncertainty about the impact of nusinersen on SMA patients’ HRQoL. Therefore, the impact of nusinersen on HRQoL should be examined using more robust study designs.Keywords: spinal muscular atrophy, health-related quality of life, nusinersen, health services accessibility, Saudi Arabia

Keywords