Cancers (Apr 2024)

Controversies in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage

  • Christoph Frank Dietrich,
  • Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono,
  • Manoop S. Bhutani,
  • Barbara Braden,
  • Eike Burmester,
  • Pietro Fusaroli,
  • Michael Hocke,
  • Andrè Ignee,
  • Christian Jenssen,
  • Abed Al-Lehibi,
  • Emad Aljahdli,
  • Bertrand Napoléon,
  • Mihai Rimbas,
  • Giuseppe Vanella

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091616
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 9
p. 1616

Abstract

Read online

In this 14th document in a series of papers entitled “Controversies in Endoscopic Ultrasound” we discuss various aspects of EUS-guided biliary drainage that are debated in the literature and in practice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is still the reference technique for therapeutic biliary access, but EUS-guided techniques for biliary access and drainage have developed into safe and highly effective alternative options. However, EUS-guided biliary drainage techniques are technically demanding procedures for which few training models are currently available. Different access routes require modifications to the basic technique and specific instruments. In experienced hands, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage is also a good alternative. Therefore, in this paper, we compare arguments for different options of biliary drainage and different technical modifications.

Keywords