BJPsych Open (Jan 2024)

Proxy measures for the assessment of psychotic and affective symptoms in studies using electronic health records

  • Álvaro López-Díaz,
  • Fernanda Jazmín Palermo-Zeballos,
  • Luis Gutierrez-Rojas,
  • Luis Alameda,
  • Francisco Gotor-Sánchez-Luengo,
  • Nathalia Garrido-Torres,
  • Johann Métrailler,
  • Livia Alerci,
  • Vincent Bonnarel,
  • Pablo Cano-Domínguez,
  • Elma Avanesi-Molina,
  • Miguel Soto-Ontoso,
  • Rocio Torrecilla-Olavarrieta,
  • Leticia Irene Muñoz-Manchado,
  • Pedro Torres-Hernández,
  • Fermín González-Higueras,
  • Juan Luis Prados-Ojeda,
  • Mario Herrera-Cortés,
  • José Miguel Meca-García,
  • Rafael Manuel Gordillo-Urbano,
  • Cristina Sánchez-Robles,
  • Tomás Delgado-Durán,
  • María Felipa Soriano-Peña,
  • Philippe Golay,
  • Philippe Conus,
  • Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,
  • Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.623
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background There is a lack of standardised psychometric data in electronic health record (EHR)-based research. Proxy measures of symptom severity based on patients' clinical records may be useful surrogates in mental health EHR research. Aims This study aimed to validate proxy tools for the short versions of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS-6) and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-6). Method A cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted in a sample of 116 patients with first-episode psychosis from 12 public hospitals in Spain. Concordance between PANSS-6, YMRS-6 and MADRS-6 scores and their respective proxies was evaluated based on information from EHR clinical notes, using a variety of statistical procedures, including multivariate tests to adjust for potential confounders. Bootstrapping techniques were used for internal validation, and an independent cohort from the Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne, Switzerland) for external validation. Results The proxy versions correlated strongly with their respective standardised scales (partial correlations ranged from 0.75 to 0.84) and had good accuracy and discriminatory power in distinguishing between patients in and not in remission (percentage of patients correctly classified ranged from 83.9 to 91.4% and bootstrapped optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.76 to 0.89), with high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81). The findings remained robust in the external validation data-set. Conclusions The proxy instruments proposed for assessing psychotic and affective symptoms by reviewing EHR provide a feasible and reliable alternative to traditional structured psychometric procedures, and a promising methodology for real-world practice settings.

Keywords