BMC Public Health (Mar 2018)

Calibration of the global physical activity questionnaire to Accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary behavior

  • Kristen M. Metcalf,
  • Barbara I. Baquero,
  • Mayra L. Coronado Garcia,
  • Shelby L. Francis,
  • Kathleen F. Janz,
  • Helena H. Laroche,
  • Daniel K. Sewell

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5310-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Self-report questionnaires are a valuable method of physical activity measurement in public health research; however, accuracy is often lacking. The purpose of this study is to improve the validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire by calibrating it to 7 days of accelerometer measured physical activity and sedentary behavior. Methods Participants (n = 108) wore an ActiGraph GT9X Link on their non-dominant wrist for 7 days. Following the accelerometer wear period, participants completed a telephone Global Physical Activity Questionnaire with a research assistant. Data were split into training and testing samples, and multivariable linear regression models built using functions of the GPAQ self-report data to predict ActiGraph measured physical activity and sedentary behavior. Models were evaluated with the testing sample and an independent validation sample (n = 120) using Mean Squared Prediction Errors. Results The prediction models utilized sedentary behavior, and moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity self-reported scores from the questionnaire, and participant age. Transformations of each variable, as well as break point analysis were considered. Prediction errors were reduced by 77.7–80.6% for sedentary behavior and 61.3–98.6% for physical activity by using the multivariable linear regression models over raw questionnaire scores. Conclusions This research demonstrates the utility of calibrating self-report questionnaire data to objective measures to improve estimates of physical activity and sedentary behavior. It provides an understanding of the divide between objective and subjective measures, and provides a means to utilize the two methods as a unified measure.

Keywords