Life (Nov 2022)

Impact of Initial Operative Urgency on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Treated with ECMO Due to Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

  • Borko Ivanov,
  • Ihor Krasivskyi,
  • Stephen Gerfer,
  • Anton Sabashnikov,
  • Mirko Doss,
  • David Holzhey,
  • Kaveh Eghbalzadeh,
  • Christian Rustenbach,
  • Elmar Kuhn,
  • Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian,
  • Navid Mader,
  • Ilija Djordjevic,
  • Thorsten Wahlers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111872
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 11
p. 1872

Abstract

Read online

The outcomes of patients with PCS and following ECMO therapy are associated with several preoperative risk factors. Our aim was to compare clinical presentation, ECMO-related data and in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with ECMO due to PCS after cardiac surgery, in regard to elective or emergent cardiac surgery procedures. Between April 2006 and October 2016, 164 consecutive patients that received VA-ECMO therapy due to PCS were identified and included in this retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into groups based on the urgency of the initial procedures performed: elective group (ELG; n = 95) and an emergency group (EMG; n = 69). To compare the unequal patient groups, a propensity score-based matching (PSM) was applied (ELG, n = 56 vs. EMG, n = 56). The EMG primarily received ECMO intraoperatively (p ≤ 0.001). In contrast, the ELG were needed ECMO support more frequently postoperatively (p n = 40) in the ELG and 76% (n = 43) in the EMG (p = 0.518). Outcome data showed no major differences in the (abdominal ischemia (p = 0.371); septic shock (p = 0.393): rhythm disturbances (p = 0.575); emergency re-thoracotomy (p = 0.418)) between the groups. The urgency of the initial procedures performed is secondary in patients suffering PCS and following ECMO. In this regard, PCS itself seems to trigger outcomes in cardiac surgery ECMO patients substantially.

Keywords