Journal of Global Oncology (Oct 2017)

Outcomes of Low-Intensity Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia at Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence in Rwanda

  • Fidel Rubagumya,
  • Mary Jue Xu,
  • Leana May,
  • Caitlin Driscoll,
  • Frank Regis Uwizeye,
  • Cyprien Shyirambere,
  • Katherine Larrabee,
  • Alexandra E. Fehr,
  • Umuhizi Denis Gilbert,
  • Clemence Muhayimana,
  • Vedaste Hategekimana,
  • Shekinah Elmore,
  • Tharcisse Mpunga,
  • Molly Moore,
  • Lawrence N. Shulman,
  • Leslie Lehmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2017.009290
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in low-income countries have disproportionately lower cure rates than those in high-income countries. At Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence (BCCOE), physicians treated patients with ALL with the first arm of the Hunger Protocol, a graduated-intensity method tailored for resource-limited settings. This article provides the first published outcomes, to our knowledge, of patients with ALL treated with this protocol. Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study of patients with ALL enrolled at BCCOE from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2014; data were collected through December 31, 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate patient demographics, disease characteristics, and outcomes; event-free survival was assessed at 2 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Forty-two consecutive patients with ALL were included. At the end of the study period, 19% (eight) were alive without evidence of relapse: three completed treatment and five were continuing treatment. Among the remaining patients, 71% (30) had died and 10% (four) were lost to follow-up. A total of 83% (25) of the deaths were disease related, 3% (one) treatment-related, and 13% (four) unclear. Event-free survival was 22% (95% CI, 11% to 36%), considering lost to follow-up as an event, and 26% (95% CI, 13% to 41%) if lost to follow-up is censored. Conclusion: As expected, relapse was the major cause of failure with this low-intensity regimen. However, toxicity was acceptably low, and BCCOE has decided to advance to intensity level 2. These results reflect the necessity of a data-driven approach and a continual improvement process to care for complex patients in resource-constrained settings.