Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology (Jun 2024)

Impact of COVID‐19 on facial plastic surgery volumes: A large database analysis of pre‐ and post‐pandemic trends

  • F. Jeffrey Lorenz,
  • Andrew J. Rothka,
  • Heather K. Schopper,
  • Jessyka G. Lighthall

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1292
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 3
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective During the COVID‐19 pandemic, elective surgeries faced cancelations due to quarantine measures. The objective of this study was to assess facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) volume before, during, and after the height of the pandemic on a national scale. Methods The TriNetX Research Network identified 68,101,098 individuals aged 18+ with healthcare interactions from 2017 to 2022. Rates of common FPRS surgeries and procedures were compared during March–August of each year, aligning with the pandemic lockdown. Results Compared to immediately before the pandemic in 2019, the 2020 pandemic peak saw an overall surgical volume reduction of −36.8%, with specific surgeries decreasing significantly: rhinoplasty (−28.6%), septoplasty (−34.0%), rhytidectomy (−54.9%), blepharoplasty (−40.7%), brow lift (−43.8%), ectropion/entropion repair (−35.6%), repair of blepharoptosis (−45.6%), correction of lagophthalmos (−29.9%), correction of lid retraction (−36.8%), and lipectomy (−41.8%) (p < .001). The procedural volume also decreased by 28.6%, encompassing reductions in various procedures: botulinum toxin A (−18.7%), facial filler (−40.7%), dermabrasion (−62.3%), chemical peel (−36.6%), and intralesional injection (−33.3%) (p < .001). In contrast to 2020, 2021 witnessed an increase of +75.0% in total surgical and +61.3% procedural volume: rhinoplasty (+81.0%), septoplasty (+74.7%), rhytidectomy (+143.4%), blepharoplasty (+81.7%), brow lift (+64.5%), ectropion/entropion repair (+55.2%), repair of blepharoptosis (+62.7%), correction of lagophthalmos (+39.0%), correction of lid retraction (+73.0%), lipectomy (+121.2%), botulinum toxin A (+52.4%), filler (+59.6%), dermabrasion (+91.8%), chemical peel (+78.8%), and intralesional injection (+67.3%) (p < .001). In 2022, rates of total surgeries (+8.5%) and procedures (+12.8%) surpassed pre‐pandemic levels from 2019 (p < .001). Conclusions FPRS experienced significant pandemic‐induced decreases, followed by a notable recovery in subsequent years, with certain surgeries and procedures surpassing pre‐pandemic levels. Level of Evidence 4.

Keywords