PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

  • Coralie Amadou,
  • Vincent Melki,
  • Jennifer Allain,
  • Sylvaine Clavel,
  • Didier Gouet,
  • Lucy Chaillous,
  • Bogdan Catargi,
  • Pauline Schaeplynck-Belicard,
  • Catherine Petit,
  • Charles Thivolet,
  • Alfred Penfornis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289684
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 8
p. e0289684

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundWe assessed the performance and patient satisfaction of a new insulin patch pump, the A7+TouchCare (Medtrum), compared with the Omnipod system.MethodsThis multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study enrolled 100 adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1C ≥ 6.5% and ≤ 9.5%, i.e., 48 to 80 mmol/mol) who were assigned with the Omnipod or with the A7+TouchCare pump for 3 months. The primary study outcome was the glucose management indicator (GMI) calculated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).ResultsPremature withdrawals occurs respectively in 2 and 9 participants in the Omnipod and TouchCare groups. In the Per Protocol analysis, the difference in GMI between groups was 0.002% (95% confidence interval -0.251; 0.255). The non-inferiority was demonstrated since the difference between treatments did not overlap the pre-defined non-inferiority margin (0.4%). There was no significant difference in CGM parameters between groups. On average, patients in both groups were satisfied/very satisfied with the insulin pump system. Patients preferred Omnipod as an insulin management system and especially the patch delivery system but preferred the A7+TouchCare personal diabetes manager to control the system.ConclusionsThis study showed that the A7+TouchCare insulin pump was as efficient as the Omnipod pump in terms of performance and satisfaction.Clinical trail registrationThe study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov protocol register (NCT04223973).