PLoS ONE (Jan 2010)

Prioritizing emerging zoonoses in the Netherlands.

  • Arie H Havelaar,
  • Floor van Rosse,
  • Catalin Bucura,
  • Milou A Toetenel,
  • Juanita A Haagsma,
  • Dorota Kurowicka,
  • J Hans A P Heesterbeek,
  • Niko Speybroeck,
  • Merel F M Langelaar,
  • Johanna W B van der Giessen,
  • Roger M Cooke,
  • Marieta A H Braks

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013965
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 11
p. e13965

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND: To support the development of early warning and surveillance systems of emerging zoonoses, we present a general method to prioritize pathogens using a quantitative, stochastic multi-criteria model, parameterized for the Netherlands. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A risk score was based on seven criteria, reflecting assessments of the epidemiology and impact of these pathogens on society. Criteria were weighed, based on the preferences of a panel of judges with a background in infectious disease control. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Pathogens with the highest risk for the Netherlands included pathogens in the livestock reservoir with a high actual human disease burden (e.g. Campylobacter spp., Toxoplasma gondii, Coxiella burnetii) or a low current but higher historic burden (e.g. Mycobacterium bovis), rare zoonotic pathogens in domestic animals with severe disease manifestations in humans (e.g. BSE prion, Capnocytophaga canimorsus) as well as arthropod-borne and wildlife associated pathogens which may pose a severe risk in future (e.g. Japanese encephalitis virus and West-Nile virus). These agents are key targets for development of early warning and surveillance.