Frontiers in Microbiology (Jul 2023)

Novel next generation sequencing panel method for the multiple detection and identification of foodborne pathogens in agricultural wastewater

  • Dong-Geun Park,
  • Dong-Geun Park,
  • Dong-Geun Park,
  • Dong-Geun Park,
  • Joon-Gi Kwon,
  • Joon-Gi Kwon,
  • Joon-Gi Kwon,
  • Joon-Gi Kwon,
  • Eun-Su Ha,
  • Byungcheol Kang,
  • Iseul Choi,
  • Jeong-Eun Kwak,
  • Jeong-Eun Kwak,
  • Jeong-Eun Kwak,
  • Jeong-Eun Kwak,
  • Jinho Choi,
  • Woojung Lee,
  • Seung Hwan Kim,
  • Soon Han Kim,
  • Jeongwoong Park,
  • Ju-Hoon Lee,
  • Ju-Hoon Lee,
  • Ju-Hoon Lee,
  • Ju-Hoon Lee

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1179934
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

Detecting and identifying the origins of foodborne pathogen outbreaks is a challenging. The Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel method offers a potential solution by enabling efficient screening and identification of various bacteria in one reaction. In this study, new NGS panel primer sets that target 18 specific virulence factor genes from six target pathogens (Bacillus cereus, Yersinia enterocolitica, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus) were developed and optimized. The primer sets were validated for specificity and selectivity through singleplex PCR, confirming the expected amplicon size. Crosscheck and multiplex PCR showed no interference in the primer set or pathogenic DNA mixture. The NGS panel analysis of spiked water samples detected all 18 target genes in a single reaction, with pathogen concentrations ranging from 108 to 105 colony-forming units (CFUs) per target pathogen. Notably, the total sequence read counts from the virulence factor genes showed a positive association with the CFUs per target pathogen. However, the method exhibited relatively low sensitivity and occasional false positive results at low pathogen concentrations of 105 CFUs. To validate the detection and identification results, two sets of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses were independently performed on the same spiked water samples, yielding almost the same efficiency and specificity compared to the NGS panel analysis. Comparative statistical analysis and Spearman correlation analysis further supported the similarity of the results by showing a negative association between the NGS panel sequence read counts and qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. To enhance NGS panel analysis for better detection, optimization of primer sets and real-time NGS sequencing technology are essential. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable insights into applying NGS panel analysis for multiple foodborne pathogen detection, emphasizing its potential in ensuring food safety.

Keywords