Frontiers in Medicine (Sep 2024)

The molecular tumor board as a step in cancer patient management: a southern Italian experience

  • Stefania Tommasi,
  • Leonarda Maurmo,
  • Alessandro Rizzo,
  • Claudia Carella,
  • Girolamo Ranieri,
  • Simona De Summa,
  • Francesco Mannavola,
  • Vincenzo Emanuele Chiurì,
  • Michele Guida,
  • Claudia Nisi,
  • Michele Montrone,
  • Francesco Giotta,
  • Margherita Patruno,
  • Rosanna Lacalamita,
  • Brunella Pilato,
  • Francesco Alfredo Zito,
  • Livia Fucci,
  • Claudio Antonio Coppola,
  • Paolo Ditonno,
  • Patrizia Nardulli,
  • Davide Quaresmini,
  • Sabino Strippoli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1432628
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe management of cancer patients follows a Diagnostic Therapeutic and Care Pathway (PDTA) approach, aimed at achieving the optimal balance between care and quality of life. To support this process, precision medicine and innovative technologies [e.g., next-generation sequencing (NGS)] allow rapid identification of genetic-molecular alterations useful for the design of PDTA-approved therapies. If the standard approach proves inadequate, the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a group comprising specialists from diverse disciplines, can step in to evaluate a broader molecular profile, proposing potential therapies beyond evidence levels I–II or considering enrolment in clinical trials. Our aim is to analyze the role of the MTB in the entire management of patients in our institute and its impact on the strategy of personalized medicine, particularly when all approved treatments have failed.Materials and methodsIn alignment with European and national guidelines, a panel of clinicians and preclinical specialists from our institution was defined as the MTB core team. We designed and approved a procedure for the operation of this multidisciplinary group, which is the only one operating in the Puglia region.Results and discussionIn 29 months (2021–2023), we discussed and analyzed 93 patients. A total of 44% presented pathogenic alterations, of which 40.4% were potentially actionable. Only 11 patients were proposed for enrollment in clinical trials, treatment with off-label drugs, or AIFA (the Italian pharmaceutical agency for drugs)—5% funding. Our process indicators, time to analysis, and number of patient cases discussed are in line with the median data of other European institutions. Such findings underscore both the importance and usefulness of the integration of an MTB process into the care of oncology patients.

Keywords