mAbs (Jan 2020)

Post-hoc assessment of the immunogenicity of three antibodies reveals distinct immune stimulatory mechanisms

  • Robin E. Walsh,
  • Megan Lannan,
  • Yi Wen,
  • Xiaoli Wang,
  • Christopher A. Moreland,
  • Jill Willency,
  • Michael D. Knierman,
  • Laura Spindler,
  • Ling Liu,
  • Wei Zeng,
  • Guilherme V. Rocha,
  • Victor Obungu,
  • Jirong Lu,
  • Arunan Kaliyaperumal,
  • Andrea Ferrante,
  • Robert Siegel,
  • Laurent P. Malherbe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1764829
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Biologics have the potential to induce an immune response when used therapeutically. A number of in vitro assays are currently used preclinically to predict the risk of immunogenicity, but the validation of these preclinical tools suffers from the relatively small number of accessible immunogenic molecules and the limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying the immunogenicity of biologics. Here, we present the post-hoc analysis of three monoclonal antibodies with high immunogenicity in the clinic. Two of the three antibodies elicited a CD4 T cell proliferative response in multiple donors in a peripheral blood mononuclear cell assay, but required different experimental conditions to induce these responses. The third antibody did not trigger any T cell response in this assay. These distinct capacities to promote CD4 T cell responses in vitro were mirrored by different capacities to stimulate innate immune cells. Only one of the three antibodies was capable of inducing human dendritic cell (DC) maturation; the second antibody promoted monocyte activation while the third one did not induce any innate cell activation in vitro. All three antibodies exhibited a moderate to high internalization by human DCs and MHC-associated peptide proteomics analysis revealed the presence of potential T cell epitopes that were confirmed by a T-cell proliferation assay. Collectively, these findings highlight the existence of distinct immune stimulatory mechanisms for immunogenic antibodies. These findings have implications for the preclinical immunogenicity risk assessment of biologics.

Keywords