جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی (Jun 2022)

Frequency Analysis and Investigation of the Factors Affecting 100-yr Peak-Flood in Iran’s Watersheds

  • ٍEsmaeel Parizi,
  • Seiyed Mossa Hosseini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2022.130040.1450
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33, no. 2
pp. 17 – 36

Abstract

Read online

AbstractThe purpose of the current study is to analyze the frequency of peak flood discharge with a 100-year return period in 206 Iran watersheds and to quantify it based on the most important factors. In this regard, flood frequency analysis was performed based on annual maximum discharge data and fitting of conventional continuous distributions in hydrology and fitting statistical tests. Then, for modeling, 8 parameters affecting the flood peak discharge including heavy daily rainfall, average vegetation, area, perimeter, average slope, average elevation, length of the main river, and the slope of the main river at the catchment area leading to the extraction of selected hydrometric stations. Also, the stepwise regression analysis technique was used to determine the factors affecting the production of flood peak discharge in the selected stations. The results of the study showed that the southwestern, southern, and southeastern basins of Iran with peak discharges of more than 4000 m3/s had the highest 100-year peak discharges among the study basins. The results of the stepwise regression model indicated that five parameters of area, heavy rainfall, elevation, vegetation, and slope of the basin with an adjusted coefficient of determination of 0.72, standard error of estimation of 132.7, Akaike's information criterion of 1.62, and variance inflation factor of 0.62 had the best performance in estimating the flood peak discharge. The results of this study, considering its large spatial scale, which includes the whole of Iran, can be used as a practical guide by the hydrologists and decision-makers in estimating the 100-year flood peak discharge in ungauged watersheds based on the most important factors affecting its generations. IntroductionFlood is one of the most important natural hazards that has attracted a lot of attention from managers and planners due to the heavy damage it has caused to human societies (Jahangir et al., 2019). In fact, floods, as a type of natural disaster, have a significant negative impact on regional development, and its catastrophes are characterized by sudden water flow, high intensity, uncontrollable factors, and serious damages (Miceli et al., 2008). On the other hand, among various types of natural disasters such as earthquakes, landslides, soil erosion, and tsunamis, floods are considered to be the most common and destructive phenomena of the earth that affect the lives of many people every year (Doocy et al., 2013; Salvati et al., 2018; Yari et al., 2019). High socio-economic losses, human casualties, widespread destruction, and threatening living conditions are some of the damages that floods can cause (Turgut & Tevfik, 2012). It can be stated that half of the deaths occur due to floods (FitzGerald et al., 2010; Lee & Vink, 2015). In recent years, Iran has experienced very destructive floods due to climate change and poor watershed management (deforestation, overgrazing, and lack of flood control measures). For example, the recent floods (2019) in Iran have affected 25 provinces, killed 77 people, and caused about $ 2.2 billion in damage to these 25 provinces (Khosravi et al., 2020). MethodologyIn the first step, the Iran hydrometric stations that had discharge data with maximum long-term annual peak records (at least 30 years) were collected from the Iran Water Resources Management Company. In the next step, flood frequency analysis was performed based on the fitting of conventional continuous distributions in hydrology and fitting statistical tests. After performing flood frequency analysis and estimating peak discharge for 100 year return period, the watersheds boundary of hydrometric stations was determined. In this regard, using a digital elevation model with 12.5 m resolution and ARC GIS, Global Mapper, and Surfer software, the boundaries of the studied watersheds were extracted. Then, using the watersheds boundary and digital elevation model, the geomorphic parameters of the watershed such as perimeter, area, average slope, average elevation, length of the main river, and the slope of the main river were calculated. In the next step, long-term daily precipitation data of synoptic stations were collected from Iran Meteorological Organization. Then, 95% of the non-zero daily precipitation series was calculated for heavy precipitation (Gu et al., 2017). Using the IDW method, the long-term amount of heavy rainfall for each watershed was determined in GIS software. The NDVI index was used to determine the mean annual vegetation. In this regard, the vegetation time series for each watershed was extracted using Landsat images from 2000 to 2019 with a resolution of 30 m on the Google Earth Engine platform. After calculating the 100-year return period and possible parameters influencing the flood in the study watersheds, using Pearson bivariate analysis and stepwise regression model, the most suitable models for estimating flood peak discharge were determined. DiscussionThe results of the study show that the southwestern, southern, and southeastern watersheds of Iran with peak discharges of more than 4000 cubic meters per second have the highest peak discharges of 100 years among the study watersheds. Meanwhile, the Minab watershed, which ends in the Persian Gulf, has a maximum peak flow of 100 years with a peak flow of 12,614 cubic meters per second. On the other hand, the northwestern and northern watersheds of Iran with a peak discharge of less than 300 cubic meters per second have the lowest peak discharge, with a minimum discharge of 20.7 cubic meters per second related to the Solan watershed in Hamadan province. The findings of the stepwise regression model indicated that the five parameters of the watershed, including area, heavy rainfall, mean elevation, vegetation, and mean slope with R2 = 0.72 and significance level of 0.01, are the most influential factors in the estimation of flood peak discharge. In addition, the results showed that the three factors of watershed area, heavy rainfall, and mean slope have a direct relationship with peak discharge but mean elevation and vegetation have an inverse relationship. ConclusionThis study quantified the relative contribution of driving factors influencing the flood peak discharge over 100 years across Iran. Considering its large spatial scale, which includes the whole of Iran, it can be used as a practical guide by the hydrologists and decision-makers in estimating the 100-year flood peak discharge in ungauged watersheds based on the most important factors affecting its generations. Keywords: Flood Peak Discharge, Modeling, Iran’s Watersheds, Stepwise Regression, Geomorphic Factors. References- Adhikari, P., Hong, Y., Douglas, K. R., Kirschbaum, D. B., Gourley, J., Adler, R., & Brakenridge, G. R. (2010). A digitized global flood inventory (1998–2008): Compilation and preliminary results. Journal of Natural Hazards, 55(2), 405–422.- Ahern, M., Kovats, R. S., Wilkinson, P., Few, R., & Matthies, F. (2005). Global health impacts of floods: Epidemiologic evidence. Journal of Epidemiologic Reviews, 27(1), 36–46.- Bennett, B., Leonard, M., Deng, Y., & Westra, S. (2018). An empirical investigation into the effect of antecedent precipitation on flood volume. Journal of Hydrology, 567, 435–445.- Chang, H. S., & Chen, T. L. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of local flood vulnerability indicators within flood-prone areas in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(23), 1-14.- Chau, K. W. (2017). Use of meta-heuristic techniques in rainfall-runoff modelling. Basel, Switzerland: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.- Chuntian, C., & Chau, K. W. (2002). Three-person multi-objective conflict decision in reservoir flood control. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(3), 625–631.- Croke, J., Thompson, C., & Fryirs, K. (2017). Prioritising the placement of riparian vegetation to reduce flood risk and end-of-catchment sediment yields: Important considerations in hydrologically-variable regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 190, 9–19.- Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Packer, C., Dick, A., & Kirsch, T. D. (2013). The human impact of earthquakes: A historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. Journal of Plos Currents, 5.- El-Hames, A. S. (2012). An empirical method for peak discharge prediction in ungauged arid and semi-arid region catchments based on morphological parameters and SCS curve number. Journal of Hydrology, 456, 94-100.- Ezemonye, M. N., & Emeribe, C. N. (2011). Flood characteristics and management adaptations in parts of the Imo river system. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 4(3), 56–64.- Falah, F., Rahmati, O., Rostami, M., Ahmadisharaf, E., Daliakopoulos, I. N., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2019). Artificial neural networks for flood susceptibility mapping in data-scarce urban areas. In Spatial modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences (pp. 323-336). Elsevier.- Feng, L. H., & Lu, J. (2010). The practical research on flood forecasting based on artificial neural networks. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2974–2977.- FitzGerald, G., Du, W., Jamal, A., Clark, M., & Hou, X. (2010). Flood fatalities in contemporary Australia (1997–2008). Journal of Emergency Medicine Australasia, 22(2), 180–186.- Ghavidel, Y., & Hombari, F. J. (2020). Synoptic analysis of unexampled super-heavy rainfall on April 1, 2019, in west of Iran. Journal of Natural Hazards, 104(2), 1567-1580.- Gu, X., Zhang, Q., Singh, V. P., & Shi, P. (2017). Changes in magnitude and frequency of heavy precipitation across China and its potential links to summer temperature. Journal of Hydrology, 547, 718–731.- Haghizadeh, A., Siahkamari, S., Haghiabi, A. H., & Rahmati, O. (2017). Forecasting flood-prone areas using Shannon’s entropy model. Journal of Earth System Science, 126(3), 1-11.- Haynes, K., Coates, L., van den Honert, R., Gissing, A., Bird, D., de Oliveira, F. D., … & Radford, D. (2017). Exploring the circumstances surrounding flood fatalities in Australia, 1900–2015 and the implications for policy and practice. Journal of Environmental Science & Policy, 76, 165–176.- Herget, J., Roggenkamp, T., & Krell, M. (2014). Estimation of peak discharges of historical floods. Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(10), 4029.- Jahangir, M. H., Reineh, S. M. M., & Abolghasemi, M. (2019). Spatial predication of flood zonation mapping in Kan River Watershed, Iran, using artificial neural network algorithm. Journal of Weather and Climate Extremes, 25, 100215.- Khosravi, K., Panahi, M., Golkarian, A., Keesstra, S. D., Saco, P. M., Bui, D. T., & Lee, S. (2020). Convolutional neural network approach for spatial prediction of flood hazard at national scale of Iran. Journal of Hydrology, 591, 125552.- Khosravi, K., Pourghasemi, H. R., Chapi, K., & Bahri, M. (2016). Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: A comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(12), 1-21.- Kirch, W., Menne, B., & Bertollini, R. (Eds.). (2005). Extreme weather events and public health responses. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.- Lashkari, H., Mohammadi, Z., & Jafari, M., 2020. Investigation on dynamical structure and moisture sources of heavy precipitation in south and south-west of Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13(21), 1-15.- Lee, S., & Vink, K. (2015). Assessing the vulnerability of different age groups regarding flood fatalities: Case study in the Philippines. Journal of Water Policy, 17(6), 1045–1061.- Liu, D., Fan, Z., Fu, Q., Li, M., Faiz, M. A., Ali, S., … & Khan, M. I. (2020). Random forest regression evaluation model of regional flood disaster resilience based on the whale optimization algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119468.- Liu, Y., Yuan, X., Guo, L., Huang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2017). Driving force analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution of flash floods in Sichuan Province. Journal of Sustainability, 9(9), 1527.- Machado, R. A. S., Oliveira, A. G., & Lois-González, R. C. (2019). Urban ecological infrastructure: The importance of vegetation cover in the control of floods and landslides in Salvador/Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Land Use Policy, 89, 104180.- Mallakpour, I., Villarini, G., Jones, M. P., & Smith, J. A. (2017). On the use of Cox regression to examine the temporal clustering of flooding and heavy precipitation across the central United States. Journal of Global and Planetary Change, 155, 98-108.- Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I., & Settanni, M. (2008). Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 164–173.- Norouzi, G., & Taslimi, M. (2012). The impact of flood damages on production of Iran’s agricultural sector. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 12, 921-926.- Ogato, G. S., Bantider, A., Abebe, K., & Geneletti, D. (2020). Geographic information system (GIS)-Based multicriteria analysis of flooding hazard and risk in Ambo Town and its watershed, west Shoa zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 27, 100659.- Sadeghi-Pouya, A., Nouri, J., Mansouri, N., & Kia-Lashaki, A. (2017). An indexing approach to assess flood vulnerability in the western coastal cities of Mazandaran, Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 304-316.- Saksena, S., & Merwade, V. (2015). Incorporating the effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 180-194.- Salvati, P., Petrucci, O., Rossi, M., Bianchi, C., Pasqua, A. A., & Guzzetti, F. (2018). Gender, age and circumstances analysis of flood and landslide fatalities in Italy. Journal of Science of the Total Environment, 610, 867–879.- Seckin, N., & Guven, A. (2012). Estimation of peak flood discharges at ungauged sites across Turkey. Journal of Water Resources Management, 26(9), 2569-2581.- Shabanikiya, H., Seyedin, H., Haghani, H., & Ebrahimian, A. (2014). Behavior of crossing flood on foot, associated risk factors and estimating a predictive model. Journal of Natural Hazards, 73(2), 1119–1126.- Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Ronoud, S., Asadi, S., Pham, B. T., Mansouripour, F., … & Bui, D. T. (2021). Flash flood susceptibility mapping using a novel deep learning model based on deep belief network, back propagation and genetic algorithm. Journal of Geoscience Frontiers, 12(3), 101100.- Smith, K. (2013). Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge.- Tang, J., Li, Y., Cui, S., Xu, L., Hu, Y., Ding, S., & Nitivattananon, V. (2021). Analyzing the spatiotemporal dynamics of flood risk and its driving factors in a coastal watershed of southeastern China. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 121, 107134.- Turgut, A., & Tevfik, T. (2012). Floods and drowning incidents by floods. Journal of World Applied Sciences, 16(8), 1158–1162.- Wang, C., Du, S., Wen, J., Zhang, M., Gu, H., Shi, Y., & Xu, H. (2017). Analyzing explanatory factors of urban pluvial floods in Shanghai using geographically weighted regression. Journal of Stochastic Environmental Research Risk Assessment, 31(7), 1777-1790.- Yari, A., Ardalan, A., Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Zarezadeh, Y., Boubakran, M. S., Bidarpoor, F., & Rahimiforoushani, A. (2019). Underlying factors affecting death due to flood in Iran: A qualitative content analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40, 101258.- Zorn, C. R., & Shamseldin, A. Y. (2015). Peak flood estimation using gene expression programming. Journal of Hydrology, 531, 1122-1128.

Keywords