Recovery Mechanisms for Cyclic (Huff-n-Puff) Gas Injection in Unconventional Reservoirs: A Quantitative Evaluation Using Numerical Simulation

Abstract

Unconventional reservoirs produce large volumes of oil; however, recovery factors are low. While enhanced oil recovery (EOR) with cyclic gas injection can increase recovery factors in unconventional reservoirs, the mechanisms responsible for additional recovery are not well understood. We examined cyclic gas injection recovery mechanisms in unconventional reservoirs including oil swelling, viscosity reduction, vaporization, and pressure support using a numerical flow model as functions of reservoir fluid gas–oil ratio (GOR), and we conducted a sensitivity analysis of the mechanisms to reservoir properties and injection conditions. All mechanisms studied contributed to the additional recovery, but their significance varied with GOR. Pressure support provides a small response for all fluid types. Vaporization plays a role for all fluids but is most important for gas condensate reservoirs. Oil swelling impacts low-GOR oils but diminishes for higher-GOR oil. Viscosity reduction plays a minor role for low-GOR cases. As matrix permeability and fracture surface area increase, the importance of gas injection decreases because of the increased primary oil production. Changes to gas injection conditions that increase injection maturity (longer injection times, higher injection rates, and smaller fracture areas) result in more free gas and, for these cases, vaporization becomes important. Recovery mechanisms for cyclic gas injection are now better understood and can be adapted to varying conditions within unconventional plays, resulting in better EOR designs and improved recovery.

Keywords

• EOR
• cyclic gas injection
• unconventional
• recovery mechanisms
• vaporization
• oil swelling