PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?

  • Tom Schmidt-Braekling,
  • Dorothee Sieber,
  • Georg Gosheger,
  • Jan C Theil,
  • Burkhard Moellenbeck,
  • Dimosthenis Andreou,
  • Ralf Dieckmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212072
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
p. e0212072

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:Due to the increasing numbers of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures being carried out, the frequency of major acetabular defects is also rising. A combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup has been used in our department since 2007 in order to reduce the dislocation rate associated with complex defects. Although both implants have an important place in endoprosthetics, there are as yet limited data on the dislocation and complication rates with this combination. METHODS:This retrospective study included all patients in whom a Burch-Schneider cage and a dual mobility cup were implanted in our department between 2007 and 2014 and who had a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. RESULTS:The study included 79 patients with a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years. The implant survival rate was 85% at 65 months. Postoperative dislocation occurred in two cases (2.1%), with the first dislocation taking place within the first 3 weeks in both of these patients. CONCLUSIONS:The present study shows a promising dislocation rate with a combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup. Particularly in the medium-term follow-up, no further dislocations occurred in the study. A maximum cup inclination of 45° in revision cases was associated with a lower dislocation rate in this group of patients.