Frontiers in Medicine (Feb 2022)

Subcutaneous IL-6 Inhibitor Sarilumab vs. Standard Care in Hospitalized Patients With Moderate-To-Severe COVID-19: An Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Rosario García-Vicuña,
  • Rosario García-Vicuña,
  • Sebastián C. Rodriguez-García,
  • Francisco Abad-Santos,
  • Francisco Abad-Santos,
  • Azucena Bautista Hernández,
  • Lucio García-Fraile,
  • Ana Barrios Blandino,
  • Angela Gutiérrez Liarte,
  • Tamara Alonso-Pérez,
  • Laura Cardeñoso,
  • Aránzazu Alfranca,
  • Aránzazu Alfranca,
  • Gina Mejía-Abril,
  • Jesús Sanz Sanz,
  • Isidoro González-Alvaro

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.819621
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe use of IL-6 blockers in COVID-19 hospitalized patients has been associated with a reduction in mortality compared to standard care. However, many uncertainties remain pertaining to optimal intervention time, administration schedule, and predictors of response. To date, data on the use of subcutaneous sarilumab is limited and no randomized trial results are available.MethodsOpen label randomized controlled trial at a single center in Spain. We included adult patients admitted with microbiology documented COVID-19 infection, imaging confirmed pneumonia, fever and/or laboratory evidence of inflammatory phenotype, and no need for invasive ventilation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive sarilumab, a single 400 mg dose in two 200 mg subcutaneous injections, added to standard care or standard care, in a 2:1 proportion. Primary endpoints included 30-day mortality, mean change in clinical status at day 7 scored in a 7-category ordinal scale ranging from death (category 1) to discharge (category 7), and duration of hospitalization. The primary efficacy analysis was conducted on the intention-to-treat population.ResultsA total of 30 patients underwent randomization: 20 to sarilumab and 10 to standard care. Most patients were male (20/30, 67%) with a median (interquartile range) age of 61.5 years (56–72). At day 30, 2/20 (10%) patients died in the sarilumab arm vs. none (0/10) in standard care (Log HR 15.11, SE 22.64; p = 0.54). At day 7, no significant differences were observed in the median change in clinical status (2 [0–3]) vs. 3 [0–3], p = 0.32). Median time to discharge (days) was similar (7 [6–11] vs. 6 [4–12]; HR 0.65, SE 0.26; p = 0.27). No significant differences were detected in the rate of progression to invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation.Conclusions and RelevanceOur pragmatic pilot study has failed to demonstrate the benefit of adding subcutaneous sarilumab to standard care for mortality by 30 days, functional status at day 7, or hospital stay. Findings herein do not exclude a potential effect of sarilumab in severe COVID-19 but adequately powered blinded randomized phase III trials are warranted to assess the impact of the subcutaneous route and a more selected target population.Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04357808.

Keywords