International Journal of Women's Dermatology (Mar 2024)

Evaluating minority representation across health care settings in hidradenitis suppurativa and psoriasis

  • Charlotte Greif, MD,
  • Ruby S. Gibson, MD,
  • Alexa B. Kimball, MD, MPH,
  • Zachary E. Holcomb, MD,
  • Martina L. Porter, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000129
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
p. e129

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Females and minorities have been underrepresented in clinical research despite legislative efforts, including in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and psoriasis (PsO) clinical trials. Objective:. To identify differences in demographic breakdowns of HS and PsO patients between health care settings to uncover any causative health disparities. Methods:. This study reports racial, ethnic, and sex of HS and PsO patient populations across the emergency department (ED), inpatient, clinical trial, and registry settings. In addition, 95% confidence intervals are used as proxies of statistical significance to compare demographics between settings. Results:. Female, Hispanic, and Black patients were underrepresented in HS clinical trials compared to their population prevalence (female: 63.7% vs 73.5%; Hispanic: 3.8% vs 12.0%; Black: 9.1% vs 20.3%). Female and Black patients were underrepresented in PsO trials compared to their population prevalence (female: 33.0% vs 54.8%; Black: 2.2% vs 5.7%). Black patients were overrepresented in the inpatient and ED settings in HS (inpatient vs ED vs population prevalence: 49.9% vs 49.9% vs 20.3%) and in the inpatient setting in PsO (inpatient vs population prevalence: 19.8% vs 5.7%). Limitations:. The main limitation is the reliability and generalizability of the published studies used to compare demographics across settings. Conclusion:. Underrepresentation of females and minorities in HS and PsO clinical trials is consistent with published literature. Overrepresentation of Black patients in acute care settings is likely multifactorial.