The role of culture-negative infection among infectious complications after total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Introduction Diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult with the clinical signs of periprosthetic inflammation showing no growth of microorganism in the biomaterial. The frequency of culture-negative infection can reach 42.1 %. The objective of the study was to analyze outcomes of two-stage treatment of chronic PJI of the knee joint depending on the etiology of the infectious process. Material and methods A retrospective analysis of outcomes was produced for 103 patients: group I (n=30) showing no growth of microorganisms and group II (n = 73) demonstrating positive growth of pathogens. Knee PJI was diagnosed according to the 2018 ICM criteria. A favorable outcome suggested absence of recurrence for at least two years after reimplantation of endoprosthesis, arthrodesis, “life with a spacer” without signs of infection. Results Culture-negative infection was detected in 29.1 % (n = 30). Patients in the group were 1.5 times more likely to receive antibiotic therapy prior to admission and had average levels of CRP, ESR and articular leukocyte count being 1.5-2 times less than those in group II. Staphylococci (69.8 %) including MRSE (75 %) was the leading pathogen in group II. Recurrence of infection was 3.4 % in group I and 16.9 % in group II (p = 0.0928), the two-stage treatment was successful in 96.7 % and 74 %, respectively (p = 0.0064). Discussion Causes for the lack of growth of microorganisms in biological materials included previous antibiotic therapy, wound drainage, violations of the rules for sampling of biological material, absence of media for the growth of atypical microorganisms and the ability of microorganisms to form biofilms on implant surfaces. An emergency histological examination of the affected tissues was practical during surgery in doubtful situations for adequate surgical approach. The results of a meta-analysis (2023) showed that the replacement of an infected endoprosthesis was more effective for the treatment of a culture-negative infection compared to debridement and preservation of implant. Conclusion The culture-negative infection group in our series showed better success rate of a two-stage treatment of PJI using implant replacement and broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic therapy at a two-year follow-up period. The negative microbiological result in the group could be caused by antibacterial drugs administered prior to diagnosis of PJI.

Keywords

• periprosthetic joint infection
• culture-negative infection
• culture-positive infection
• revision arthroplasty
• inflammation markers
• knee joint