Respiratory Research (May 2024)

Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very low birth weight neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Alvaro Moreira,
  • Michelle Noronha,
  • Jooby Joy,
  • Noah Bierwirth,
  • Aina Tarriela,
  • Aliha Naqvi,
  • Sarah Zoretic,
  • Maxwell Jones,
  • Ali Marotta,
  • Taylor Valadie,
  • Jonathan Brick,
  • Caitlyn Winter,
  • Melissa Porter,
  • Isabelle Decker,
  • Matteo Bruschettini,
  • Sunil K. Ahuja

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02850-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Importance Large-scale estimates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) are warranted for adequate prevention and treatment. However, systematic approaches to ascertain rates of BPD are lacking. Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of BPD in very low birth weight (≤ 1,500 g) or very low gestational age (< 32 weeks) neonates. Data sources A search of MEDLINE from January 1990 until September 2019 using search terms related to BPD and prevalence was performed. Study selection Randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating rates of BPD in very low birth weight or very low gestational age infants were eligible. Included studies defined BPD as positive pressure ventilation or oxygen requirement at 28 days (BPD28) or at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (BPD36). Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently conducted all stages of the review. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled prevalence. Subgroup analyses included gestational age group, birth weight group, setting, study period, continent, and gross domestic product. Sensitivity analyses were performed to reduce study heterogeneity. Main outcomes and measures Prevalence of BPD defined as BPD28, BPD36, and by subgroups. Results A total of 105 articles or databases and 780,936 patients were included in this review. The pooled prevalence was 35% (95% CI, 28-42%) for BPD28 (n = 26 datasets, 132,247 neonates), and 21% (95% CI, 19-24%) for BPD36 (n = 70 studies, 672,769 neonates). In subgroup meta-analyses, birth weight category, gestational age category, and continent were strong drivers of the pooled prevalence of BPD. Conclusions and relevance This study provides a global estimation of BPD prevalence in very low birth weight/low gestation neonates.

Keywords