Will Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty Be Lost to History? A Comparative Study of Long-Term Follow-Up

Abstract

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants were introduced as an alternative to fixed-bearing (FB) implants because of their theoretical advantages related to femorotibial rotational mismatch. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of MB and FB TKA after approximately 13 years of follow-up. We compared the results of 88 patients with a mean age of 66 years who had received a rotating platform MB implant or a FB implant. The mean follow-up was 13.6 years. The patients were assessed clinically (VAS, ROM, KSS, WOMAC scores) and radiographically before and 13 years after operation. There were no statistically significant differences between the FB and MB groups in terms of clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes (p > 0.05 for all). Although the incidence of complications was higher in the MB group, the findings were not statistically significant compared to the FB group (p > 0.05 for all). Although there were no significant differences in the clinical and radiologic outcomes between the FB and MB groups, the possible higher risk of osteolysis or aseptic loosening in the MB group could be an important clinical implication when selecting the TKA implant.

Keywords

• total knee arthroplasty
• mobile-bearing
• fixed-bearing
• osteolysis
• aseptic loosening