Materials (Jul 2022)

Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers

  • Sanda Ileana Cimpean,
  • Adela Loredana Colceriu Burtea,
  • Radu Stefan Chiorean,
  • Mircea Cristian Dudescu,
  • Aurora Antoniac,
  • Alina Robu,
  • Radu Septimiu Campian,
  • Lucia Iacobina Timis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144966
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 14
p. 4966

Abstract

Read online

The purposes of the study were to evaluate the influence of the sealer’s chemical composition on the interfacial strength between root canal dentin and root filling material, for two different classes of endodontic sealers, and to assess their failure modes. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into four groups using the following endodontic sealers: RealSeal SE and Resilon (RSSE); EndoSequence BC sealer and BC Point (EBCS); Endoseal MTA and gutta-percha (EDS); Bioroot RCS and gutta-percha (BRS). Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, and the roots were sectioned horizontally into 1 mm slices. For each slice, the perimeter was measured. A push-out test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. For each sample, bond strength was calculated. Specimens were examined by SEM investigation in order to analyze the dentin–sealer–core interface. Results were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey and Bonferroni test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that EDS and gutta-percha had significantly higher resistance to dislodgement compared to the other three groups (p p Conclusions: Bioceramic endodontic sealers showed a higher bond strength to root dentin than methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealer.

Keywords