Rheumatology (Oct 2023)

The perspective of Polish patients with rheumatoid arthritis – treatment expectations, patient-reported outcomes, and digital literacy (the SENSE study)

  • Marcin Stajszczyk,
  • Grażyna Świerkowska,
  • Katarzyna Smolik,
  • Izabela Domysławska,
  • Karol Charkiewicz,
  • Włodzimierz Samborski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/reum/171625
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 61, no. 5
pp. 331 – 338

Abstract

Read online

Introduction A widely accepted treat-to-target strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires the patient’s perspective in making treatment decisions. However, data on treatment preferences and expectations of Polish patients with RA are scarce. The aim of the study was to determine the satisfaction with treatment and the nature of therapeutic preferences and expectations of Polish patients with moderate to severe RA. Material and methods Fifty-two adult Polish patients with moderately to highly active RA were asked to complete pa-tient-reported outcomes and patient-provided information questionnaires. Additionally, patient sociodemographic and clinical data and information on patient current and planned treatment strategies were collected. Results The mean global assessment of patient satisfaction with treatment was 64.1 ±24.6, below the level of indicating satisfaction. Rheumatoid arthritis negatively impacted patients’ lives, resulting in a 37.8% impairment of work efficiency and 45% impairment of total activity. Primary treatment expectations for patients were lasting relief of RA symptoms, reduced pain and swelling in joints, in-creased flexibility of joints, and general improvement of arthritis. The most acceptable potential side effect was weight gain and the least acceptable were increases in the risk of cardiovascular disease, infection, and malignancies. The rapid onset of the drug effect (up to 1 week) was a preference of 48.1% of patients. Access to internet health resources was important for 44.2% of patients, but the median total eHealth literacy score in the study population was 24.0 (interquartile range: 20.5–28.0, range 8–37), which means low digital health literacy (DHL). Conclusions Understanding these treatment preferences and expectations of patients with RA is essential for clinical practitioners to facilitate shared treatment decision-making. Digital health literacy data suggest the need of further improvement.

Keywords