Journal of Dental Sciences (Jan 2021)

In-vitro fatigue and fracture performance of three different ferrulized implant connections used in fixed prosthesis

  • Saverio Cosola,
  • Paolo Toti,
  • Enrico Babetto,
  • Ugo Covani,
  • Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago,
  • David Peñarrocha-Oltra

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 397 – 403

Abstract

Read online

Background/purpose: The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate fatigue resistance of dental fixtures in three different types of fixture/abutment finishing line. Materials and methods: Transmucosal dental implants, with or without ferrulized neck, underwent fatigue tests (static and dynamic load) using the following standard protocol: UNI EN ISO 14801:2016. Two types of loading devices (screw- or cement-retained restoration) were also tested, and fatigue cycle tests were run to failure. Data of static and dynamic load tests were analyzed by proper statistical methods. Results: Following standard protocol for fatigue testing, the ILC type (Implant Level with ferrulized neck and cement-retained crown) showed a non-significant but higher Ultimate Failure Load (UFL = 445.7 N) compared to AL type (Abutment Level without ferrule effect, 421.6 N) and ILS type (Implant Level with ferrulized neck and Screw-retained crown, 362.8 N). No fracture of the titanium-base was registered in the tested specimens during the static loadings. Permanent deformations of the materials were observed. Conclusion: The number of cycles to either fracture or deformation (higher than 4 mm) occurring during fatigue tests showed that the stress rupture curve of the materials in group ILS appeared to be significantly different from those of the ILC and AL groups (p-values < 0.01): much higher life of one-half order of magnitude.

Keywords