Genome Biology (May 2020)

Insights gained from a comprehensive all-against-all transcription factor binding motif benchmarking study

  • Giovanna Ambrosini,
  • Ilya Vorontsov,
  • Dmitry Penzar,
  • Romain Groux,
  • Oriol Fornes,
  • Daria D. Nikolaeva,
  • Benoit Ballester,
  • Jan Grau,
  • Ivo Grosse,
  • Vsevolod Makeev,
  • Ivan Kulakovskiy,
  • Philipp Bucher

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-01996-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 18

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Positional weight matrix (PWM) is a de facto standard model to describe transcription factor (TF) DNA binding specificities. PWMs inferred from in vivo or in vitro data are stored in many databases and used in a plethora of biological applications. This calls for comprehensive benchmarking of public PWM models with large experimental reference sets. Results Here we report results from all-against-all benchmarking of PWM models for DNA binding sites of human TFs on a large compilation of in vitro (HT-SELEX, PBM) and in vivo (ChIP-seq) binding data. We observe that the best performing PWM for a given TF often belongs to another TF, usually from the same family. Occasionally, binding specificity is correlated with the structural class of the DNA binding domain, indicated by good cross-family performance measures. Benchmarking-based selection of family-representative motifs is more effective than motif clustering-based approaches. Overall, there is good agreement between in vitro and in vivo performance measures. However, for some in vivo experiments, the best performing PWM is assigned to an unrelated TF, indicating a binding mode involving protein-protein cooperativity. Conclusions In an all-against-all setting, we compute more than 18 million performance measure values for different PWM-experiment combinations and offer these results as a public resource to the research community. The benchmarking protocols are provided via a web interface and as docker images. The methods and results from this study may help others make better use of public TF specificity models, as well as public TF binding data sets.

Keywords