Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases (Oct 2019)

DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE AND SAFETY OF BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE IN THROMBOCYTOPENIC HAEMATOLOGICAL PATIENTS FOR ASPERGILLOSIS DIAGNOSIS: A MONOCENTRIC, RETROSPECTIVE EXPERIENCE.

  • Mariagiovanna Cefalo,
  • Ermanno Puxeddu,
  • Loredana Sarmati,
  • giovangiacinto paterno,
  • Carla Fontana,
  • Daniela Nassa,
  • Gloria Pane,
  • Eleonora De Bellis,
  • Raffaele Palmieri,
  • Elisa Buzzatti,
  • Federico Meconi,
  • Roberta Laureana,
  • Paola Casciani,
  • Anna Giulia Zizzari,
  • Paola Rogliani,
  • Paolo de Fabritiis,
  • Luca Maurillo,
  • Francesco Buccisano,
  • Maria Cantonetti,
  • William Arcese,
  • Adriano Venditti,
  • Maria Ilaria Del Principe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4084/mjhid.2019.065
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Background: although bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) measurements of galactomannan antigen (GM) seems to be more sensitive than serum testing to detect invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), a consensus on the most appropriate diagnostic threshold of the BAL GM test is still unclear. Moreover, there is uncertainty as to whether BAL is a safe procedure in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) and thrombocytopenia (TC). Objectives: based on this background, 102 adult patients with HM and associated thrombocytopenia were retrospectively analyzed with the twin aims of 1) determining whether BAL is a safe and feasible procedure; and, 2) identifying the most appropriate threshold for GM positivity in the diagnosis of IPA. Patients/Methods: each BAL was considered as one case/patient. One hundred twelve BALs were carried out in 102 HM patients: at the time of the BAL, the median platelets count (PLTs) in all patients was 47x109/L (1-476) and 31 patients (27%) had PLTs0.8 was associated with the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 72.97% and specificity 80%). Antifungal treatment of patients with BAL GM >0.8resulted in a clinical-radiological improvement in 35/41patients (85%). Conclusions: BAL was a safe procedure also in thrombocytopenic patients, permitting an IPA diagnosis not otherwise identifiable using EORTC/MSG criteria. Our data suggest that a BAL GM value of>0.8 represents the most useful cut-off in terms of sensibility and specificity. Further prospective studies on a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these results.

Keywords