Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Dec 2004)

Incidência de trombo intracardíaco e de tromboembolismo nos três primeiros meses após o implante de bioprótese valvar Incidence of intracardiac thrombus and thromboembolism in the first three months after bioprosthetic valve implantation

  • Auristela Isabel de Oliveira Ramos,
  • Helio Maximiano de Magalhães,
  • Mercedes Maldonado,
  • Dorival Júlio Della Togna,
  • Zilda Machado Meneghelo,
  • Antoninho Sanfins Arnoni,
  • Lucia Machado,
  • Nisia Lyra Gomes,
  • Paulo Paredes Paulista

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2004001900009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 83, no. spe
pp. 46 – 52

Abstract

Read online

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a incidência de trombo intracardíaco e de tromboembolismo nos três primeiros meses após a troca valvar por bioprótese e identificar fatores de risco para a formação de trombo. MÉTODO:Incluídos 184 pacientes, entre 15 e 75 anos de idade, submetidos a implante de bioprótese e realizados ecocardiogramas transtorácico e transesofágico (ETE) na fase hospitalar, média 8,4±3 dias, e três meses após, média 97,4±21,7 dias. RESULTADOS: Incidência de trombo foi significativamente mais elevada nos pacientes com prótese em posição mitral ou mitroaórtica (21,0%) do que em posição aórtica (2,8%), pOBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of intracardiac thrombus and thromboembolism in the first 3 months after bioprosthetic valve replacement and to identify the risk factors for thrombus formation. METHODS: The study comprised 184 patients, aged between 15 and 75 years, who underwent bioprosthetic valve implantation. Transthoracic and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiographies were performed in the in-hospital phase (mean, 8.4±3 days) and after 3 months (mean, 97.4±21.7 days). RESULTS: The incidence of thrombus was significantly greater in patients with a prosthesis in the mitral or mitroaortic position (21.0%) than in those with a prosthesis in the aortic position (2.8%), P<0.001. The multiple logistic regression identified the prosthesis in the mitral or mitroaortic position as the only independent variable for thrombus formation. On the 3-month follow-up, TEE showed a thrombus in 35 (20.7%) of the 169 patients on echocardiographic assessment, 31.7% in mitral patients and 3.1% in aortic patients, P<0.001. In the third month, the multiple logistic regression also identified the prosthesis in the mitral or mitroaortic position as the only independent variable for thrombus formation. During the 3-month follow-up, 3 (1.6%) patients died and 8 (4.3%) experienced embolic phenomena, all in the cerebral territory. CONCLUSION: The incidence of thrombi in the first 3 months after bioprosthetic valve implantation was 14.1% in the first 10 days and 20.7% in 3 months. A prosthesis in the mitral or mitroaortic position was identified as a risk factor for thrombus formation. The incidence of embolic phenomena clinically diagnosed was lower than the proportion of atrial thrombi documented on echocardiography.

Keywords