PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Association between recruitment methods and attrition in Internet-based studies.

  • Paolo Bajardi,
  • Daniela Paolotti,
  • Alessandro Vespignani,
  • Ken Eames,
  • Sebastian Funk,
  • W John Edmunds,
  • Clement Turbelin,
  • Marion Debin,
  • Vittoria Colizza,
  • Ronald Smallenburg,
  • Carl Koppeschaar,
  • Ana O Franco,
  • Vitor Faustino,
  • AnnaSara Carnahan,
  • Moa Rehn,
  • Franco Merletti,
  • Jeroen Douwes,
  • Ridvan Firestone,
  • Lorenzo Richiardi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114925
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 12
p. e114925

Abstract

Read online

Internet-based systems for epidemiological studies have advantages over traditional approaches as they can potentially recruit and monitor a wider range of individuals in a relatively inexpensive fashion. We studied the association between communication strategies used for recruitment (offline, online, face-to-face) and follow-up participation in nine Internet-based cohorts: the Influenzanet network of platforms for influenza surveillance which includes seven cohorts in seven different European countries, the Italian birth cohort Ninfea and the New Zealand birth cohort ELF. Follow-up participation varied from 43% to 89% depending on the cohort. Although there were heterogeneities among studies, participants who became aware of the study through an online communication campaign compared with those through traditional offline media seemed to have a lower follow-up participation in 8 out of 9 cohorts. There were no clear differences in participation between participants enrolled face-to-face and those enrolled through other offline strategies. An Internet-based campaign for Internet-based epidemiological studies seems to be less effective than an offline one in enrolling volunteers who keep participating in follow-up questionnaires. This suggests that even for Internet-based epidemiological studies an offline enrollment campaign would be helpful in order to achieve a higher participation proportion and limit the cohort attrition.