PLoS ONE (Feb 2011)

"Dynamic range" of inferred phenotypic HIV drug resistance values in clinical practice.

  • Luke C Swenson,
  • Graham Pollock,
  • Brian Wynhoven,
  • Theresa Mo,
  • Winnie Dong,
  • Robert S Hogg,
  • Julio S G Montaner,
  • P Richard Harrigan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017402
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 2
p. e17402

Abstract

Read online

Background'Virtual' or inferred phenotypes (vPhenotypes) are commonly used to assess resistance to antiretroviral agents in patients failing therapy. In this study, we provide a clinical context for understanding vPhenotype values.MethodsAll HIV-infected persons enrolled in the British Columbia Drug Treatment Program with a baseline plasma viral load (pVL) and follow-up genotypic resistance and pVL results were included up to October 29, 2008 (N = 5,277). Change from baseline pVL was determined as a function of Virco vPhenotype, and the "dynamic range" (defined here by the 10th and 90th percentiles for fold-change in IC₅₀ amongst all patients) was estimated from the distribution of vPhenotye fold-changes across the cohort.ResultsThe distribution of vPhenotypes from a large cohort of HIV patients who have failed therapy are presented for all available antiretroviral agents. A maximum change in IC₅₀ of at least 13-fold was observed for all drugs. The dideoxy drugs, tenofovir and most PIs exhibited small "dynamic ranges" with values of 99% of samples. In contrast, zidovudine, lamivudine, emtricitabine and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inihibitors (excluding etravirine) had large dynamic ranges.ConclusionWe describe the populational distribution of vPhenotypes such that vPhenotype results can be interpreted relative to other patients in a drug-specific manner.