Indian Journal of Transplantation (Jan 2023)

Modified laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy to avoid hilar rotation and decrease warm ischemia time

  • Satish Kumar Ranjan,
  • Pragnesh Desai,
  • Vinay Rai,
  • Brij Mohan Joshi,
  • Ritesh Goel,
  • Rohit Kaushal,
  • Samit Chaturvedi,
  • Ruchir Maheshwari,
  • Anant Kumar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_42_23
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 4
pp. 443 – 447

Abstract

Read online

Background: Right living donor nephrectomy is technically more demanding because of the anatomical differences. Patient safety is the utmost priority because it is performed on healthy donors. We hereby describe our experiences with surgical modifications to minimize donor morbidity and overcome surgical challenges in the cases of right living donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the prospectively maintained perioperative and follow-up data of standard and modified right living donor nephrectomies performed in the recent past 10 years at our institute. We also compared the significant events in corresponding recipients. Student's t-tests were used to define statistical significance. Results: A total of 1530 laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies were performed between 2012 and 2021, of which 117 were on the right side. Of them, 62 donors underwent modified right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (MRLDN) and 55 underwent standard right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The mean duration of surgery (103.44 ± 14.59 vs. 139.45 ± 25.99 min), warm ischemia time (4.30 ± 0.59 vs. 5.89 ± 0.91 min), and blood loss (90.24 ± 24.75 vs. 103.72 ± 33.37 mL) were significantly lower in modified as compared to standard donor nephrectomy (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative diuresis, acute tubular necrosis, and serum creatinine at 3 months in the corresponding recipient group. Conclusion: MRLDN is a safe, reliable, and reproducible technique of right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Keywords