Obesity Science & Practice (Aug 2024)

Assessing the state of obesity care: Quality, access, guidelines, and standards

  • Lee M. Kaplan,
  • Caroline M. Apovian,
  • Jamy D. Ard,
  • David B. Allison,
  • Louis J. Aronne,
  • Rachel L. Batterham,
  • Luca Busetto,
  • Dror Dicker,
  • Deborah B. Horn,
  • Aaron S. Kelly,
  • Jeffrey I. Mechanick,
  • Jonathan Q. Purnell,
  • Ximena Ramos‐Salas,
  • for the Assessing the State of Obesity Care Writing Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.765
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background An international panel of obesity medicine experts from multiple professional organizations examined patterns of obesity care and current obesity treatment guidelines to identify areas requiring updating in response to emerging science and clinical evidence. Aims The panel focused on multiple medical health and societal issues influencing effective treatment of obesity and identified several unmet needs in the definition, assessment, and care of obesity. Methods The panel was held in Leesburg, Virginia in September 2019. Results The panelists recommended addressing these unmet needs in obesity medicine through research, education, evaluation of delivery and payment of care, and updating clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to better reflect obesity’s pathophysiological basis and heterogeneity, as well as the disease’s health, sociocultural, and economic complications; effects on quality of life; need for standards for quantitative comparison of treatment benefits, risks, and costs; and the need to more effectively integrate obesity treatment guidelines into routine clinical practice and to facilitate more direct clinician participation to improve public understanding of obesity as a disease with a pathophysiological basis. The panel also recommended that professional organizations working to improve the care of people with obesity collaborate via a working group to develop an updated, patient‐focused, comprehensive CPG establishing standards of care, addressing identified needs, and providing for routine, periodic review and updating. Conclusions Unmet needs in the definition, assessment and treatment of obesity were identified and a blueprint to address these needs developed via a clinical practice guideline that can be utilized worldwide to respond to the increasing prevalence of obesity.

Keywords