PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Clinical academic research in the time of Corona: A simulation study in England and a call for action.

  • Amitava Banerjee,
  • Michail Katsoulis,
  • Alvina G Lai,
  • Laura Pasea,
  • Thomas A Treibel,
  • Charlotte Manisty,
  • Spiros Denaxas,
  • Giovanni Quarta,
  • Harry Hemingway,
  • João L Cavalcante,
  • Mahdad Noursadeghi,
  • James C Moon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237298
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 8
p. e0237298

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesWe aimed to model the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on the clinical academic response in England, and to provide recommendations for COVID-related research.DesignA stochastic model to determine clinical academic capacity in England, incorporating the following key factors which affect the ability to conduct research in the COVID-19 climate: (i) infection growth rate and population infection rate (from UK COVID-19 statistics and WHO); (ii) strain on the healthcare system (from published model); and (iii) availability of clinical academic staff with appropriate skillsets affected by frontline clinical activity and sickness (from UK statistics).SettingClinical academics in primary and secondary care in England.ParticipantsEquivalent of 3200 full-time clinical academics in England.InterventionsFour policy approaches to COVID-19 with differing population infection rates: "Italy model" (6%), "mitigation" (10%), "relaxed mitigation" (40%) and "do-nothing" (80%) scenarios. Low and high strain on the health system (no clinical academics able to do research at 10% and 5% infection rate, respectively.Main outcome measuresNumber of full-time clinical academics available to conduct clinical research during the pandemic in England.ResultsIn the "Italy model", "mitigation", "relaxed mitigation" and "do-nothing" scenarios, from 5 March 2020 the duration (days) and peak infection rates (%) are 95(2.4%), 115(2.5%), 240(5.3%) and 240(16.7%) respectively. Near complete attrition of academia (87% reduction, ConclusionsPandemic COVID-19 crushes the science needed at system level. National policies mitigate, but the academic community needs to adapt. We highlight six key strategies: radical prioritisation (eg 3-4 research ideas per institution), deep resourcing, non-standard leadership (repurposing of key non-frontline teams), rationalisation (profoundly simple approaches), careful site selection (eg protected sites with large academic backup) and complete suspension of academic competition with collaborative approaches.