Comparative study of the effect of preoperative hookwire and methylene blue localization techniques on post-operative hospital stay and complications in thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule surgery

Abstract

Abstract Background Direct localization of small and deep pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery using the hookwire or methylene blue techniques has been recently attempted for better surgical outcomes. In this study, we compare the outcomes of the above two techniques. Methods Two hundred and nineteen patients undergoing 135 hookwire and 151 methylene blue techniques in our University Hospital between July 2020 and January 2022 were compared for localization and hospitalization durations, and the complication risk. Other confounders included patients’ age, gender, localization position, nodules location, count, diameter, and depth. Results After adjustment of all predictors, the methylene blue technique was associated with a significant 0.6-min (parameter estimate (PE) = −0.568, p value = 0.0173) and an 0.7-day shorter localization and hospitalization time (PE = −0.713, p value = < 0.0001) as compared to using the hookwire technique. The hookwire technique was significantly associated with 5 times the risk of developing a post-localization complication (Adjusted Odds Ratio (Adj OR) = 4.52, 95% CI 1.53–13.33) and 3.6 times the risk of developing a pneumothorax (Adj OR = 3.57, 95% CI 1.1–11.62) as compared to adopting the methylene blue technique. Conclusions Compared to the hook wire technique, the methylene blue technique offers a shorter procedure and hospitalization stay, as well as a safer post-operative experience.

Keywords

• Patient outcomes
• Thoracoscopic surgery
• Lung cancer
• Hookwire
• Methylene blue
• Interventional radiology