Wildlife Society Bulletin (Jun 2016)

Field capture, chemical immobilization, and morphometrics of a little‐studied South American carnivore, the lesser grison

  • Estela M. Luengos Vidal,
  • Diego F. Castillo,
  • Nicolas C. Caruso,
  • Emma B. Casanave,
  • Mauro Lucherini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.654
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 40, no. 2
pp. 400 – 405

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT We assessed chemical immobilization and success of trapping devices on a little‐known South American mustelid, the lesser grison (Galictis cuja). From December 1998 to June 2006, we live‐trapped (n = 23) and radiomarked (n = 9) free‐ranging lesser grisons in 2 areas of the Pampas grasslands of Argentina. Both box‐traps and rubber‐padded leg‐hold traps allowed us to capture lesser grisons. However, leg‐hold traps had greater capture efficiency. Although the liberation time was longer with tiletamine–zolazepam than ketamine–xylazine, field immobilization of lesser grisons with both drug combinations was effective and safe. The high frequency of thermal regulation problems suggests that body temperatures of chemically restrained lesser grisons should be routinely monitored. Neither collars nor backpack harnesses were effective methods for attachment of radiotransmitters. Trapped individuals showed male‐skewed sexual size dimorphism and sex ratio. Capture times suggest that lesser grisons are largely diurnal. Most of the data presented in this study are the first published on the lesser grison and provide baseline information for future research and conservation. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.

Keywords