Indian Heart Journal (Mar 2017)

Profiling cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure patients in India: The Pan-arrhythmia and Heart Failure Observational Study

  • Amit Vora,
  • Ajay Naik,
  • Yash Lokhandwala,
  • Arun Chopra,
  • Jagmohan Varma,
  • G.S Wander,
  • Aparna Jaswal,
  • V. Srikanthan,
  • Balbir Singh,
  • Dhiman Kahali,
  • Anoop Gupta,
  • R.R. Mantri,
  • Anil Mishra,
  • Ulhas Pandurangi,
  • Debashis Ghosh,
  • Jitendra Singh Makkar,
  • Sujaayaa Sahu,
  • Rajesh Radhakrishnan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.329
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 69, no. 2
pp. 226 – 239

Abstract

Read online

Background: The PANARrhythMia and Heart Failure Registry (PANARM HF) characterized demographic, clinical and interventional therapy indication profiles of cardiac arrhythmia (CA) and heart failure (HF) patients in India. Methods: Consulting Physicians (CP) who medically manage CA and HF patients enrolled patients with one or more of the following: syncope, pre-syncope, dyspnea, palpitation, fatigue and LV dysfunction. The CPs were trained by interventional cardiologists (IC) to identify CA/HF patients indicated for implantable device/radiofrequency ablation (RFA). 59 CP’s, 16 IC’s & 2205 patients from 12 cities participated. Demographic, clinical, device/RFA indication and referral-consultation profiles were created. IC’s provided device/RFA recommendations based on these profiles. Results: The CA/HF distribution of patients was: HF – 58%, bradyarrhythmia – 15%, atrial fibrillation – 15%, other supraventricular tachyarrhythmia – 10% and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation – 4.5%. 62% of the CA/HF population was male and 45% were below age 60. Coronary artery disease (52%), hypertension (44%), diabetes (30%) & myocardial infarction (20%) were prominent. 1011 (46%) of the CA/HF population were potential device/RFA candidates according to the IC’s. However, only 700 (69%) of these patients were referred to the IC by the CP. Of referred patients, only 177 (25%) consulted the IC and were recommended therapy. Thus, 824 (83%) of patients indicated for interventional therapy were not advised therapy or did not opt for it. Conclusion: The India PANARM HF study provides new information and insights into the demographic, clinical, interventional therapy, referral and consultation pattern profiles of CA/HF patients in India.