Pilot and Feasibility Studies (Oct 2017)

Pilot parallel randomised controlled trial of protective socks against usual care to reduce skin tears in high risk people: ‘STOPCUTS’

  • Roy J. Powell,
  • Christopher J. Hayward,
  • Caroline L. Snelgrove,
  • Kathleen Polverino,
  • Linda Park,
  • Rohan Chauhan,
  • Philip H. Evans,
  • Rachel Byford,
  • Carolyn Charman,
  • Christopher J. W. Foy,
  • Colin Pritchard,
  • Andrew Kingsley

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0182-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 1
pp. 1 – 22

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Skin tears are common in older adults and those taking steroids and warfarin. They are traumatic, often blunt injuries caused by oblique knocks to the extremities. The epidermis may separate from the dermis or both layers from underlying tissues leaving a skin flap or total loss of tissue, which is painful and prone to infection. ‘Dermatuff™’ knee-length socks containing Kevlar fibres (used in stab-proof vests and motorcyclists’ clothing) aim to prevent skin tears. The acceptability of the socks and the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) had not been explored. Methods In this pilot parallel group RCT, 90 people at risk of skin-tear injury from Devon care homes and primary care were randomised to receive the socks or treatment as usual (TAU). The pilot aimed to estimate parameters to inform the design of a substantive trial and record professionals’ views and participants’ acceptability of the intervention and of study participation. Results Participants were randomised from July 2013 and followed up until February 2015. Community participants were easier to recruit than care homes residents but were 10 years younger on average and more active. To recruit 90 participants, 395 had to be approached overall as 77% were excluded or declined. Seventy-nine participants (88%) completed the trial and 27/44 (61%) wore the socks for 16 weeks. There were 31 skin tear injuries affecting 18 (20%) of the 90 participants. The TAU group received more injuries, more repeated episodes, and larger tears with greater severity. Common daily diary reasons for not wearing the socks included perceived warmth in hot weather or not being available (holiday, in hospital, bed rest). Resource use data were obtainable and indicated that sock wearing gave a reduction in treatment costs whilst well-completed questionnaires showed improvements in secondary outcomes. Conclusions This pilot trial has successfully informed the design and conduct of a future definitive cost-effectiveness RCT. It would need to be conducted in primary care with 880 active at-risk, elderly patients (440 per arm). Skin tear incidence and quality of life (from EQ5D5L) over a 4-month period would be the primary and secondary outcomes respectively. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN96565376 .

Keywords