PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Comparison of the effects of transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma between patients with and without extrahepatic metastases.

  • Jeong-Ju Yoo,
  • Jeong-Hoon Lee,
  • Sang Hwan Lee,
  • Minjong Lee,
  • Dong Hyeon Lee,
  • Yuri Cho,
  • Yun Bin Lee,
  • Su Jong Yu,
  • Hyo-Cheol Kim,
  • Yoon Jun Kim,
  • Jung-Hwan Yoon,
  • Chung Yong Kim,
  • Hyo-Suk Lee

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113926
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 11
p. e113926

Abstract

Read online

Background/aimsSorafenib is a standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage C). However, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has also been widely used as a treatment for patients with advanced HCC, even if they have extrahepatic metastases (EHM). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of TACE for advanced HCC patients with EHM upon initial diagnosis, as compared with those patients without EHM.MethodsThis cohort study involved consecutive patients who underwent TACE as an initial treatment for advanced HCC. One hundred seventy-seven patients with EHM (the EHM group) and 205 with portal vein invasion without EHM (the non-EHM group) were included. A survival analysis was performed to compare overall survival between the two groups.ResultsThe mean age was 54.5±9.9 years, and median follow-up duration was 13.1 months (range, 0.5-111.0). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the EHM group than the non-EHM group (median, 8.3 vs. 19.1 months; PConclusionsThe prognosis of advanced HCC patients with EHM is significantly worse than those without EHM administered repeated TACE treatments, even if their tumor stage was similar to BCLC stage C. These results suggest that EHM presence means aggressive tumor biology and that BCLC stage C might be subclassified according to EHM presence.