Research landscape of abdominal adhesions from 2004 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Adhesions are the most common complication of abdominal or pelvic surgery and remain a challenging problem. To better understand the development tendency of abdominal adhesions, we performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the field of abdominal adhesions. In total, 2219 articles regarding abdominal adhesions were screened and analyzed from 3410 manuscripts indexed in the Web of Science-indexed manuscripts regarding abdominal adhesion from 2004 to 2023. A bibliometric analysis was performed, and CiteSpace [version 6.2. R3 (64-bit)] and VOSviewer (version 1.6.19) were used to visualize the results. The number of annual publications showed slight growth before 2019, and the USA contributed the most publications. The most prolific author in this domain was Diamond, while the publications from Ten Broek had the strongest influence. The most popular journal in this field was the Journal of Surgical Research, and the most frequently co-cited journal was Fertility and Sterility. After analyzing the keywords, “prevention”, “surgery” and “peritoneal adhesion” were the 3 most co-cited keywords, while “adhesive small bowel obstruction” was the strongest keyword in the citation burst. Here, for the first time, we used bibliometric methods to study abdominal adhesions over the past ten years. By summarizing the characteristics of publications and predicting future research prospects, we established a framework for researchers and provided a basis for subsequent research.

Keywords

• Abdominal adhesion
• Postsurgical
• Bibliometrics
• CiteSpace
• Visualization analysis