SASI (Jun 2016)
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA MATI KEPADA KORUPTOR SUATU PERBANDINGAN HUKUM ANTARA INDONESIA DAN CINA
Abstract
Under the provisions of Law No. 31 Year 1999 jo Law No. 20 of 2001, the type of criminal sanctions can be imposed judges against the accused of corruption that is for people who commit criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia is Criminal Dead, Criminal Prison and Penal Supplement. Sanctions death penalty to corrupt when corruption was carried out on funding earmarked for coping with the hazards, national disasters, social unrest is widespread, the economic and monetary crisis management, and the repetition of acts of corruption. Under the provisions of this Article, the application of sanctions the death penalty for corruption imposed only if it is done in certain circumstances. In contrast to China, the Chinese government's commitment to eradicate corruption no doubt, not just a slogan or a rhetorical, because in the system of prevention of corruption in China when an officer was proved only accept bribes, then legal sanction given to him to till the death penalty. related to the implementation of sanctions Criminal die for actors in Indonesia and China, it is seen that political action imposition of capital punishment against perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia is still weak, while in China's political action imposition of capital punishment against the perpetrators of the crime of corruption is very strong due to the strong commitment of government to combating corruption. A strong commitment to prevent and combat corruption could prove the decrease of corruption
