Frontiers in Public Health (Jul 2024)

Data quality and timeliness analysis for post-vaccination adverse event cases reported through healthcare data exchange to FDA BEST pilot platform

  • Matthew Deady,
  • Ray Duncan,
  • Lance D. Jones,
  • Arianna Sang,
  • Brian Goodness,
  • Abhishek Pandey,
  • Sylvia Cho,
  • Richard A. Forshee,
  • Steven A. Anderson,
  • Hussein Ezzeldin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1379973
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThis study is part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) initiative, which aims to improve the FDA’s postmarket surveillance capabilities by using real-world data (RWD). In the United States, using RWD for postmarket surveillance has been hindered by the inability to exchange clinical data between healthcare providers and public health organizations in an interoperable format. However, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has recently enacted regulation requiring all healthcare providers to support seamless access, exchange, and use of electronic health information through the interoperable HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard. To leverage the recent ONC changes, BEST designed a pilot platform to query and receive the clinical information necessary to analyze suspected AEs. This study assessed the feasibility of using the RWD received through the data exchange of FHIR resources to study post-vaccination AE cases by evaluating the data volume, query response time, and data quality.Materials and methodsThe study used RWD from 283 post-vaccination AE cases, which were received through the platform. We used descriptive statistics to report results and apply 322 data quality tests based on a data quality framework for EHR.ResultsThe volume analysis indicated the average clinical resources for a post-vaccination AE case was 983.9 for the median partner. The query response time analysis indicated that cases could be received by the platform at a median of 3 min and 30 s. The quality analysis indicated that most of the data elements and conformance requirements useful for postmarket surveillance were met.DiscussionThis study describes the platform’s data volume, data query response time, and data quality results from the queried postvaccination adverse event cases and identified updates to current standards to close data quality gaps.

Keywords