Frontiers in Digital Health (Feb 2022)

Investigation of the Utility of Features in a Clinical De-identification Model: A Demonstration Using EHR Pathology Reports for Advanced NSCLC Patients

  • Tanmoy Paul,
  • Tanmoy Paul,
  • Md Kamruz Zaman Rana,
  • Md Kamruz Zaman Rana,
  • Preethi Aishwarya Tautam,
  • Teja Venkat Pavan Kotapati,
  • Yaswitha Jampani,
  • Yaswitha Jampani,
  • Nitesh Singh,
  • Nitesh Singh,
  • Humayera Islam,
  • Humayera Islam,
  • Vasanthi Mandhadi,
  • Vasanthi Mandhadi,
  • Vishakha Sharma,
  • Michael Barnes,
  • Richard D. Hammer,
  • Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa,
  • Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa,
  • Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa,
  • Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.728922
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundElectronic health record (EHR) systems contain a large volume of texts, including visit notes, discharge summaries, and various reports. To protect the confidentiality of patients, these records often need to be fully de-identified before circulating for secondary use. Machine learning (ML) based named entity recognition (NER) model has emerged as a popular technique of automatic de-identification.ObjectiveThe performance of a machine learning model highly depends on the selection of appropriate features. The objective of this study was to investigate the usability of multiple features in building a conditional random field (CRF) based clinical de-identification NER model.MethodsUsing open-source natural language processing (NLP) toolkits, we annotated protected health information (PHI) in 1,500 pathology reports and built supervised NER models using multiple features and their combinations. We further investigated the dependency of a model's performance on the size of training data.ResultsAmong the 10 feature extractors explored in this study, n-gram, prefix–suffix, word embedding, and word shape performed the best. A model using combination of these four feature sets yielded precision, recall, and F1-score for each PHI as follows: NAME (0.80; 0.79; 0.80), LOCATION (0.85; 0.83; 0.84), DATE (0.86; 0.79; 0.82), HOSPITAL (0.96; 0.93; 0.95), ID (0.99; 0.82; 0.90), and INITIALS (0.97; 0.49; 0.65). We also found that the model's performance becomes saturated when the training data size is beyond 200.ConclusionManual de-identification of large-scale data is an impractical procedure since it is time-consuming and subject to human errors. Analysis of the NER model's performance in this study sheds light on a semi-automatic clinical de-identification pipeline for enterprise-wide data warehousing.

Keywords