BMC Medical Education (May 2024)

The progress test as a structuring initiative for programmatic assessment

  • Débora Cristina Alavarce,
  • Melyssa Lima de Medeiros,
  • Danylo de Araújo Viana,
  • Flávia Abade,
  • Joaquim Edson Vieira,
  • José Lúcio Martins Machado,
  • Carlos Fernando Collares

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05537-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The Progress Test is an individual assessment applied to all students at the same time and on a regular basis. The test was structured in the medical undergraduate education of a conglomerate of schools to structure a programmatic assessment integrated into teaching. This paper presents the results of four serial applications of the progress test and the feedback method to students. Methods This assessment comprises 120 items offered online by means of a personal password. Items are authored by faculty, peer-reviewed, and approved by a committee of experts. The items are classified by five major areas, by topics used by the National Board of Medical Examiners and by medical specialties related to a national Unified Health System. The correction uses the Item Response Theory with analysis by the “Rasch” model that considers the difficulty of the item. Results Student participation increased along the four editions of the tests, considering the number of enrollments. The median performances increased in the comparisons among the sequential years in all tests, except for test1 – the first test offered to schools. Between subsequent years of education, 2nd-1st; 4th-3rd and 5th-4th there was an increase in median scores from progress tests 2 through 4. The final year of undergraduate showed a limited increase compared to the 5th year. There is a consistent increase in the median, although with fluctuations between the observed intervals. Conclusion The progress test promoted the establishment of regular feedback among students, teachers and coordinators and paved the road to engagement much needed to construct an institutional programmatic assessment.

Keywords