Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research (Jan 2015)

Customized clinical practice guidelines for management of adult cataract in Iran

  • Zhaleh Rajavi,
  • Mohammad Ali Javadi,
  • Narsis Daftarian,
  • Sare Safi,
  • Farhad Nejat,
  • Armin Shirvani,
  • Hamid Ahmadieh,
  • Saeid Shahraz,
  • Hossein Ziaei,
  • Hamidreza Moein,
  • Behzad Fallahi Motlagh,
  • Sepehr Feizi,
  • Alireza Foroutan,
  • Hassan Hashemi,
  • Seyed Javad Hashemian,
  • Mahmoud Jabbarvand,
  • Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab,
  • Farid Karimian,
  • Hossein Mohammad-Rabei,
  • Mehrdad Mohammadpour,
  • Nader Nassiri,
  • Mahmoodreza Panahi-Bazaz,
  • Mohammad Reza Rohani,
  • Mohammad Reza Sedaghat,
  • Kourosh Sheibani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.176913
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 4
pp. 445 – 460

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To customize clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cataract management in the Iranian population. Methods: First, four CPGs (American Academy of Ophthalmology 2006 and 2011, Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2010, and Canadian Ophthalmological Society 2008) were selected from a number of available CPGs in the literature for cataract management. All recommendations of these guidelines, together with their references, were studied. Each recommendation was summarized in 4 tables. The first table showed the recommendation itself in clinical question components format along with its level of evidence. The second table contained structured abstracts of supporting articles related to the clinical question with their levels of evidence. The third table included the customized recommendation of the internal group respecting its clinical advantage, cost, and complications. In the fourth table, the internal group their recommendations from 1 to 9 based on the customizing capability of the recommendation (applicability, acceptability, external validity). Finally, customized recommendations were sent one month prior to a consensus session to faculty members of all universities across the country asking for their comments on recommendations. Results: The agreed recommendations were accepted as conclusive while those with no agreement were discussed at the consensus session. Finally, all customized recommendations were codified as 80 recommendations along with their sources and levels of evidence for the Iranian population. Conclusion: Customization of CPGs for management of adult cataract for the Iranian population seems to be useful for standardization of referral, diagnosis and treatment of patients.

Keywords